Striemer Christopher, Locklin Jason, Blangero Annabelle, Rossetti Yves, Pisella Laure, Danckert James
Department of Psychology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
Neuropsychologia. 2009 May;47(6):1491-9. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.12.021. Epub 2008 Dec 30.
The classic definition of 'pure' optic ataxia suggests that these patients' visuomotor impairments are independent of perceptual or attentional deficits. More recent work suggests that some patients with optic ataxia also have difficulty attending to targets in their ataxic field. Thus, an important question is whether these attentional deficits might be related to the well-known problems in visuomotor control evident in these patients. To investigate this question we had controls (N=5) and CF, a patient with optic ataxia in his left visual field, perform tasks that required them to detect or reach towards targets presented in either central vision, or at different target eccentricities in the periphery. As expected, CF was less accurate than controls when reaching to targets in his ataxic (left) visual field, and was much slower than controls to detect the presence of targets in his ataxic field. The reaction times to lift the hand in the pointing and the detecting conditions were correlated in the ataxic field of patient CF, suggesting a common attentional deficit in both tasks. Importantly, although CF was slower to detect targets in the ataxic field, and less accurate to reach towards those same targets, the two deficits did not follow the same pattern. Specifically, only reaching errors in the ataxic field were strongly modulated by target eccentricity. These results suggest that dorsal posterior parietal lesions result in attention and visuomotor control problems in optic ataxia that arise from damage to independent mechanisms.
“纯粹”性视觉性共济失调的经典定义表明,这些患者的视运动障碍与感知或注意力缺陷无关。最近的研究表明,一些患有视觉性共济失调的患者在其共济失调视野中关注目标也存在困难。因此,一个重要的问题是,这些注意力缺陷是否可能与这些患者中明显存在的众所周知的视运动控制问题有关。为了研究这个问题,我们让对照组(N = 5)和患有左侧视野视觉性共济失调的患者CF执行任务,要求他们检测或指向呈现于中央视野或周边不同目标偏心度处的目标。正如预期的那样,CF在向其共济失调(左侧)视野中的目标伸手时比对照组更不准确,并且在检测其共济失调视野中的目标存在时比对照组慢得多。在患者CF的共济失调视野中,指向和检测条件下抬手的反应时间是相关的,这表明两项任务中存在共同的注意力缺陷。重要的是,尽管CF在共济失调视野中检测目标较慢,并且向这些相同目标伸手时准确性较低,但这两种缺陷并不遵循相同的模式。具体而言,只有共济失调视野中的伸手误差受到目标偏心度的强烈调节。这些结果表明,顶叶后背部病变导致视觉性共济失调中的注意力和视运动控制问题,这些问题源于对独立机制的损害。