Sauro Salvatore, Mannocci Francesco, Toledano Manuel, Osorio Raquel, Pashley David H, Watson Timothy F
Dental Biomaterials Science, Biomimetics & Biophotonics, King's College London Dental Institute at Guy's, King's College and St Thomas's Hospitals, Floor 17 Guy's Hospital, London, UK.
J Dent. 2009 Apr;37(4):279-88. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2008.12.002. Epub 2009 Jan 19.
The aim of this study was to reduce hybrid layer degradation created with simplified dentine adhesives by using two different methods to condition the dentine surface.
A smear-layer was created on flat dentine surfaces from extracted human third molars with a 180-grit/SiC-paper. Dentine specimens were conditioned before bonding with the following procedures: 37% H(3)PO(4); H(3)PO(4)/0.5% NaOCl; 0.1M EDTA; 0.1M EDTA/0.5% NaOCl. Two etch-and-rinse adhesives: (Scotchbond 1XT or Optibond Solo Plus) were applied and light-cured. Composite build-ups were constructed. The bonded teeth were sectioned into beams, stored in distilled water (24h) or 12% NaOCl solution (90 min) and finally tested for microtensile bond strengths (microTBS). Additional dentine surfaces were conditioned and bonded as previously described. They were prepared for a pulpal-micropermeability confocal microscopy study and finally observed using confocal microscopy.
microTBS results revealed that both adhesives gave high bond strengths to acid-etched dentine before, but not after a 12% NaOCl challenge. Bonds made to acid-etched or EDTA-treated dentine plus dilute NaOCl, gave high microTBS that resisted 12% NaOCl treatment, as did EDTA-treated dentine alone. A confocal micropermeability investigation showed very high micropermeability within interfaces of the H(3)PO(4), etched specimens. The lowest micropermeability was observed in H(3)PO(4)+0.5% NaOCl and 0.1M EDTA groups.
The use of dilute NaOCl (0.5%) after acid-etching, or the conditioning of dentine smear layers with 0.1M EDTA (pH 7.4) produced less porous resin-dentine interfaces. These dentine-conditioning procedures improve the resistance of the resin-dentine bond sites to chemical degradation (12% NaOCl) and may result in more durable resin-dentine bonds.
本研究旨在通过两种不同的牙本质表面处理方法,减少使用简化牙本质黏结剂时产生的混合层降解。
用180目碳化硅砂纸在拔除的人第三磨牙的平坦牙本质表面制备玷污层。在粘结前,对牙本质标本进行如下处理:37%磷酸;磷酸/0.5%次氯酸钠;0.1M乙二胺四乙酸;0.1M乙二胺四乙酸/0.5%次氯酸钠。应用两种酸蚀冲洗黏结剂(Scotchbond 1XT或Optibond Solo Plus)并光照固化。构建复合树脂充填体。将粘结的牙齿切成小梁,储存在蒸馏水中(24小时)或12%次氯酸钠溶液中(90分钟),最后测试微拉伸粘结强度(microTBS)。按照先前描述的方法对额外的牙本质表面进行处理和粘结。为牙髓微渗透性共聚焦显微镜研究准备这些样本,最后使用共聚焦显微镜进行观察。
微拉伸粘结强度结果显示,两种黏结剂在12%次氯酸钠处理前对酸蚀牙本质都有较高的粘结强度,但处理后则不然。与酸蚀或乙二胺四乙酸处理的牙本质加稀释次氯酸钠形成的粘结具有较高的微拉伸粘结强度,能抵抗12%次氯酸钠处理,单独用乙二胺四乙酸处理的牙本质也是如此。共聚焦显微镜微渗透性研究显示,磷酸蚀刻标本的界面内微渗透性非常高。在磷酸+0.5%次氯酸钠和0.1M乙二胺四乙酸组中观察到的微渗透性最低。
酸蚀后使用稀释的次氯酸钠(0.5%),或用0.1M乙二胺四乙酸(pH 7.4)处理牙本质玷污层,可产生孔隙较少的树脂-牙本质界面。这些牙本质处理程序可提高树脂-牙本质粘结部位对化学降解(12%次氯酸钠)的抵抗力,并可能导致更持久的树脂-牙本质粘结。