Huang Xiaoxing, Lu Bin, Yu Wenbo, Fang Qing, Liu Li, Zhuang Ke, Shen Tingting, Wang Haibo, Tian Po, Zhang Linqi, Chen Zhiwei
Modern Virology Research Center and AIDS Center, State Key Laboratory of Virology, College of Life Sciences, Wuhan University, Hubei, People's Republic of China.
PLoS One. 2009;4(1):e4180. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0004180. Epub 2009 Jan 13.
Mucosal vaccination offers great advantage for inducing protective immune response to prevent viral transmission and dissemination. Here, we report our findings of a head-to-head comparison of two viral vectors modified vaccinia Ankara (MVA) and a novel replication-competent modified vaccinia Tian Tan (MVTT) for inducing neutralizing antibodies (Nabs) via intramuscular and mucosal vaccinations in mice. MVTT is an attenuated variant of the wild-type VTT, which was historically used as a smallpox vaccine for millions of Chinese people. The spike glycoprotein (S) of SARS-CoV was used as the test antigen after the S gene was constructed in the identical genomic location of two vectors to generate vaccine candidates MVTT-S and MVA-S. Using identical doses, MVTT-S induced lower levels ( approximately 2-3-fold) of anti- SARS-CoV neutralizing antibodies (Nabs) than MVA-S through intramuscular inoculation. MVTT-S, however, was capable of inducing consistently 20-to-100-fold higher levels of Nabs than MVA-S when inoculated via either intranasal or intraoral routes. These levels of MVTT-S-induced Nab responses were substantially (approximately 10-fold) higher than that induced via the intramuscular route in the same experiments. Moreover, pre-exposure to the wild-type VTT via intranasal or intraoral route impaired the Nab response via the same routes of MVTT-S vaccination probably due to the pre-existing anti-VTT Nab response. The efficacy of intranasal or intraoral vaccination, however, was still 20-to-50-fold better than intramuscular inoculation despite the subcutaneous pre-exposure to wild-type VTT. Our data have implications for people who maintain low levels of anti-VTT Nabs after historical smallpox vaccination. MVTT is therefore an attractive live viral vector for mucosal vaccination.
黏膜疫苗接种在诱导保护性免疫反应以预防病毒传播和扩散方面具有巨大优势。在此,我们报告了对两种病毒载体——改良痘苗病毒安卡拉株(MVA)和一种新型具有复制能力的改良痘苗病毒天坛株(MVTT)进行直接比较的研究结果,这两种病毒载体通过肌肉注射和黏膜疫苗接种在小鼠体内诱导中和抗体(Nabs)。MVTT是野生型VTT的减毒株,历史上曾作为天花疫苗用于数百万中国人。在将严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒(SARS-CoV)的刺突糖蛋白(S)基因构建于两种载体的相同基因组位置以产生候选疫苗MVTT-S和MVA-S后,将其用作测试抗原。通过肌肉注射,使用相同剂量时,MVTT-S诱导的抗SARS-CoV中和抗体(Nabs)水平比MVA-S低(约2至3倍)。然而,当通过鼻内或口服途径接种时,MVTT-S诱导的Nabs水平始终比MVA-S高20至100倍。在相同实验中,MVTT-S诱导的这些Nab反应水平比通过肌肉途径诱导的水平高得多(约10倍)。此外,通过鼻内或口服途径预先接触野生型VTT会损害通过相同途径接种MVTT-S的Nab反应,这可能是由于预先存在的抗VTT Nab反应。然而,尽管皮下预先接触了野生型VTT,但鼻内或口服疫苗接种的效果仍比肌肉注射好20至50倍。我们的数据对在历史天花疫苗接种后抗VTT Nab水平较低的人群具有启示意义。因此,MVTT是一种有吸引力的用于黏膜疫苗接种的活病毒载体。