Suppr超能文献

非体外循环冠状动脉搭桥术可改善依赖透析的肾衰竭患者的院内死亡率。

Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting improves in-hospital mortality in patients with dialysis-dependent renal failure.

作者信息

Zhang Li, Boyce Steven W, Hill Peter C, Sun Xiumei, Lee Ann, Haile Elizabeth, Garcia Jorge M, Corso Paul J

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC 20010-2975, USA.

出版信息

Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2009 Jan-Mar;10(1):12-6. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2007.07.002.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Patients with chronic dialysis-dependent end-stage renal disease are increasingly referred for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and their early outcome is less favorable. Off-pump CABG (OPCAB) has achieved encouraging results in high-risk patients. Therefore, we designed this retrospective study to test the hypothesis that OPCAB reduced surgical risks in dialysis patients.

METHODS

From January 2000 to December 2005, 294 dialysis-dependent patients received isolated CABG at the Washington Hospital Center. Among them, 168 underwent OPCAB (off-pump group), and 126, CABG with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) (on-pump group). The in-hospital outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

The two groups were comparable in terms of preoperative characteristics. The Parsonnet's Bedside Score of the off-pump group was similar to that of the on-pump group (32.0 vs. 32.0, P=.57). The in-hospital mortality of the off-pump group was significantly lower than that of the on-pump group (5.4% vs. 11.9%, P=.04). Although the percentage of patients who received transfusions was similar, the on-pump group received more total transfusions. Logistic regression analysis revealed that use of CPB independently predicted in-hospital mortality [odds ratio (OR), 5.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.78-13.85; P<.01] and perioperative myocardial infarction (MI; OR, 5.1; 95% confidence interval, 1.18-22.40; P=.03). No significant difference in long-term survival at 4 years was absorbed between the two groups of hospital survivors.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that OPCAB is a safe alternative to on-pump CABG in dialysis patients. Avoiding CPB resulted in less perioperative blood utilization, MI, and hospital mortality.

摘要

目的

慢性依赖透析的终末期肾病患者越来越多地接受冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG),但其早期预后较差。非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术(OPCAB)在高危患者中取得了令人鼓舞的结果。因此,我们设计了这项回顾性研究,以验证OPCAB可降低透析患者手术风险这一假设。

方法

2000年1月至2005年12月,294例依赖透析的患者在华盛顿医院中心接受了单纯CABG。其中,168例行OPCAB(非体外循环组),126例行体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术(CPB)(体外循环组)。分析住院期间的结局。

结果

两组患者术前特征具有可比性。非体外循环组的帕森内特床边评分与体外循环组相似(32.0对32.0,P = 0.57)。非体外循环组的住院死亡率显著低于体外循环组(5.4%对11.9%,P = 0.04)。虽然接受输血的患者百分比相似,但体外循环组的总输血量更多。逻辑回归分析显示,使用CPB可独立预测住院死亡率[比值比(OR),5.0;95%置信区间,1.78 - 13.85;P < 0.01]和围手术期心肌梗死(MI;OR,5.1;95%置信区间,1.18 - 22.40;P = 0.03)。两组医院幸存者在4年的长期生存率方面未观察到显著差异。

结论

我们的数据表明,在透析患者中,OPCAB是体外循环CABG的一种安全替代方法。避免使用CPB可减少围手术期血液使用、MI和医院死亡率。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验