Suppr超能文献

硫唑嘌呤联合别嘌醇治疗炎症性肠病有较好的前景。

Azathioprine with Allopurinol Is a Promising First-Line Therapy for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases.

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Centre, De Boelelaan 1118, 1081 HZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Surrey and Sussex NHS, Easy Surrey Hospital, Redhill, RH1 5RH, UK.

出版信息

Dig Dis Sci. 2022 Aug;67(8):4008-4019. doi: 10.1007/s10620-021-07273-y. Epub 2021 Nov 2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Beneficial response to first-line immunosuppressive azathioprine in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is low due to high rates of adverse events. Co-administrating allopurinol has been shown to improve tolerability. However, data on this co-therapy as first-line treatment are scarce.

AIM

Retrospective comparison of long-term effectiveness and safety of first-line low-dose azathioprine-allopurinol co-therapy (LDAA) with first-line azathioprine monotherapy (AZAm) in patients with IBD without metabolite monitoring.

METHODS

Clinical benefit was defined as ongoing therapy without initiation of steroids, biologics or surgery. Secondary outcomes included CRP, HBI/SCCAI, steroid withdrawal and adverse events.

RESULTS

In total, 166 LDAA and 118 AZAm patients (median follow-up 25 and 27 months) were evaluated. Clinical benefit was more frequently observed in LDAA patients at 6 months (74% vs. 53%, p = 0.0003), 12 months (54% vs. 37%, p = 0.01) and in the long-term (median 36 months; 37% vs. 24%, p = 0.04). Throughout follow-up, AZAm patients were 60% more likely to fail therapy, due to a higher intolerance rate (45% vs. 26%, p = 0.001). Only 73% of the effective AZA dose was tolerated in AZAm patients, while LDAA could be initiated and maintained at its target dose. Incidence of myelotoxicity and elevated liver enzymes was similar in both cohorts, and both conditions led to LDAA withdrawal in only 2%. Increasing allopurinol from 100 to 200-300 mg/day significantly lowered liver enzymes in 5/6 LDAA patients with hepatotoxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

Our poor AZAm outcomes emphasize that optimization of azathioprine is needed. We demonstrated a long-term safe and more effective profile of first-line LDAA. This co-therapy may therefore be considered standard first-line immunosuppressive.

摘要

背景

由于不良反应发生率高,一线免疫抑制剂巯嘌呤在炎症性肠病(IBD)患者中的治疗效果不佳。联合应用别嘌醇已被证明可以提高耐受性。然而,关于这种联合治疗作为一线治疗的数据很少。

目的

回顾性比较无代谢物监测的 IBD 患者一线低剂量巯嘌呤-别嘌醇联合治疗(LDAA)与一线巯嘌呤单药治疗(AZAm)的长期疗效和安全性。

方法

临床获益定义为持续治疗而无需开始使用类固醇、生物制剂或手术。次要结局包括 CRP、HBI/SCCAI、类固醇停药和不良反应。

结果

共评估了 166 例 LDAA 和 118 例 AZAm 患者(中位随访时间为 25 和 27 个月)。在 6 个月(74%比 53%,p=0.0003)、12 个月(54%比 37%,p=0.01)和长期(中位数 36 个月;37%比 24%,p=0.04)时,LDAA 患者的临床获益更为频繁。在整个随访期间,AZAm 患者因不耐受率较高(45%比 26%,p=0.001)而更有可能治疗失败。AZAm 患者仅能耐受 73%的有效 AZA 剂量,而 LDAA 可以起始并维持在目标剂量。两组患者骨髓抑制和肝酶升高的发生率相似,仅有 2%的患者因这两种情况而停用 LDAA。将别嘌醇从 100mg 增加到 200-300mg/天可使 5/6 例肝毒性 LDAA 患者的肝酶显著降低。

结论

我们较差的 AZAm 结局强调需要优化巯嘌呤的治疗。我们证明了一线 LDAA 的长期安全且更有效的特征。因此,这种联合治疗可能被认为是标准的一线免疫抑制剂。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7447/9287424/2f24e1d13139/10620_2021_7273_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验