Fardy John M
Department of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Canada.
Methods Mol Biol. 2009;473:127-36. doi: 10.1007/978-1-59745-385-1_7.
As technology advances, diagnostic tests continue to improve, and each year, we are presented with new alternatives to the standard procedures. Given the plethora of diagnostic alternatives, diagnostic tests must be evaluated to determine their place in the diagnostic armamentarium. Criteria include sensitivity and specificity, positive and negative predictive values, likelihood ratios for positive and negative tests, and receiver operating characteristic curves. The prevalence of disease influences the diagnostic utility of tests, particularly when diseases are rare or very frequent.
随着技术的进步,诊断测试不断改进,每年我们都会面临标准程序之外的新选择。鉴于诊断方法众多,必须对诊断测试进行评估,以确定其在诊断手段中的地位。评估标准包括敏感性和特异性、阳性和阴性预测值、阳性和阴性测试的似然比以及受试者工作特征曲线。疾病的患病率会影响测试的诊断效用,尤其是在疾病罕见或非常常见的情况下。