Suppr超能文献

肝脏局灶性病变:超声引导下活检——细胞学和病理检查结果回顾的经验教训

Focal hepatic lesions: US-guided biopsy--lessons from review of cytologic and pathologic examination results.

作者信息

Appelbaum Liat, Kane Robert A, Kruskal Jonathan B, Romero Janet, Sosna Jacob

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.

出版信息

Radiology. 2009 Feb;250(2):453-8. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2502080182. Epub 2009 Jan 22.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To retrospectively assess factors affecting the success of ultrasonographically (US)-guided core liver biopsy of focal lesions on the basis of experience when both cytologic and pathologic examination results were available.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This HIPAA-compliant retrospective study was granted an exemption from the institutional review board. All percutaneous US-guided biopsies of focal liver lesions performed at one institution from January 2000 through February 2006 for which both cytologic and pathologic examination results were available were included. Specimen adequacy was determined with on-site cytologic examination performed with a "touch prep" technique. Of 1910 liver biopsies, 240 (12.6%) revealed focal lesions, and cytologic and pathologic examination results were available for 208 (86.7%) of these 240 lesions. The number of biopsy passes and concordance between cytologic and pathologic findings were evaluated, and correlation between lesion size, type, and location and the number of passes was assessed. The Pearson correlation chi(2) test and the Wilcoxon test were used.

RESULTS

Biopsy specimens were diagnostic in 205 cases (98.6%) and were nondiagnostic in three cases (1.4%); 85.9% of the lesions were malignant. There was a single lesion in 89 patients (42.8%), and there were multiple lesions in 119 patients (57.2%). One biopsy pass was sufficient in 58 patients (27.9%); two passes were sufficient in 75 patients (36.1%); and three, four, five, and six passes were sufficient in 51 (24.5%), 17 (8.2%), five (2.4%), and two (1.0%) patients, respectively. There was no relationship between lesion size or location and the number of passes, according to the Pearson correlation and chi(2) test (P = .16 and P = .22, respectively). On average, 1.9 passes were required for metastatic lesions, versus 2.8 for nonmetastatic lesions (P < .001, Wilcoxon test). Cytologic and histopathologic findings were discordant in 25 cases (12.0%).

CONCLUSION

The size and location of liver lesions sampled for biopsy do not influence the number of passes needed, while metastatic lesions require fewer passes. Without the on-site cytologic examination service, a predetermined number of three passes would be diagnostic in almost 90% of all cases.

摘要

目的

基于细胞病理学和组织病理学检查结果均可用的经验,回顾性评估影响超声(US)引导下局灶性肝脏病变核心活检成功率的因素。

材料与方法

这项符合健康保险流通与责任法案(HIPAA)的回顾性研究获得了机构审查委员会的豁免。纳入2000年1月至2006年2月在一家机构进行的所有经皮US引导下局灶性肝脏病变活检,且细胞病理学和组织病理学检查结果均可用。采用“触摸涂片”技术进行现场细胞学检查来确定标本是否充足。在1910例肝脏活检中,240例(12.6%)发现局灶性病变,这240例病变中有208例(86.7%)细胞病理学和组织病理学检查结果可用。评估活检穿刺次数以及细胞病理学和组织病理学结果的一致性,并评估病变大小、类型和位置与穿刺次数之间的相关性。采用Pearson相关χ²检验和Wilcoxon检验。

结果

活检标本在205例(98.6%)中具有诊断价值,在3例(1.4%)中无诊断价值;85.9%的病变为恶性。89例患者(42.8%)有单个病变,119例患者(57.2%)有多个病变。58例患者(27.9%)一次穿刺就足够;75例患者(36.1%)两次穿刺足够;51例(24.5%)、17例(8.2%)、5例(2.4%)和2例(1.0%)患者分别三次、四次、五次和六次穿刺足够。根据Pearson相关和χ²检验,病变大小或位置与穿刺次数之间无相关性(P值分别为0.16和0.22)。转移性病变平均需要1.9次穿刺,而非转移性病变平均需要2.8次穿刺(Wilcoxon检验,P<0.001)。细胞病理学和组织病理学结果在25例(12.0%)中不一致。

结论

活检取材的肝脏病变大小和位置不影响所需穿刺次数,而转移性病变所需穿刺次数较少。如果没有现场细胞学检查服务,预定三次穿刺在几乎90%的所有病例中可获得诊断。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验