• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Medical experts and the law: Safeguarding children, the public and the profession.

作者信息

Skellern Catherine

机构信息

Community Child Health Service, Fortitude Valley, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

出版信息

J Paediatr Child Health. 2008 Dec;44(12):736-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1754.2008.01423.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1440-1754.2008.01423.x
PMID:19166533
Abstract

Paediatricians working in child protection are sometimes required to act as expert witnesses in legal proceedings. Given the significant influence of opinion evidence on the jury, it is imperative that they understand their responsibilities to the court in this medico-legal interface and recognise their boundaries of expertise. Recent cases in the United Kingdom and in Australia have thrown the spotlight on paediatricians working as forensic experts in legal proceedings which has led to much public scrutiny and intervention by medical disciplinary bodies placing practice sanctions on child protection paediatricians. These decisions have had a significant impact on the workforce, with fewer paediatricians and those in training now willing to work in the field because of fears of disciplinary sanctions being instigated by those adversely affected by unfavourable forensic opinions. This article includes a detailed summary of these cases including excerpts from legal judgments, which highlight critical issues for the expert witness, which have had a significant impact on individuals, the profession and impacted on public confidence in the profession. In Australia, it is timely that we reflect on these lessons learnt and look to development of educational standards and forensic credentialing to enable continuity of a skilled paediatric workforce in child protection.

摘要

相似文献

1
Medical experts and the law: Safeguarding children, the public and the profession.
J Paediatr Child Health. 2008 Dec;44(12):736-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1754.2008.01423.x.
2
Shortage of paediatric radiologists acting as an expert witness: position statement from the British Society of Paediatric Radiology (BSPR) National Working Group on Imaging in Suspected Physical Abuse (SPA).儿科放射科医生担任专家证人的短缺:英国儿科放射学会(BSPR)疑似身体虐待影像学国家工作组的立场声明。
Clin Radiol. 2019 Jul;74(7):496-502. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2019.04.016. Epub 2019 May 21.
3
Paediatric expert witness.
J Paediatr Child Health. 2013 Aug;49(8):611-3. doi: 10.1111/jpc.12168. Epub 2013 Mar 29.
4
Defining standards for medico-legal reports in forensic evaluation of suspicious childhood injury.
J Forensic Leg Med. 2012 Jul;19(5):267-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jflm.2012.02.009. Epub 2012 Mar 10.
5
[Estimation of incapacity to work in medico-legal opinions given by clinicians and forensic medicine specialists from the Department of Forensic Medicine, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice--comparative analysis].[西里西亚医科大学法医学系临床医生和法医学专家出具的法医学意见中工作能力丧失的评估——比较分析]
Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol. 2005 Oct-Dec;55(4):261-3.
6
The relevance of the Goudge inquiry to the practice of child protection/forensic paediatrics.古奇调查对儿童保护/法医儿科实践的相关性。
J Forensic Leg Med. 2014 Oct;27:35-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jflm.2014.07.009. Epub 2014 Aug 11.
7
Defining 'reasonable medical certainty' in court: What does it mean to medical experts in child abuse cases?在法庭上界定“合理医学确定性”:在虐待儿童案件中对医学专家而言这意味着什么?
Child Abuse Negl. 2015 Dec;50:218-27. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2015.10.027. Epub 2015 Nov 14.
8
Role of the tertiary child protection paediatrician: expert and advocate.三级儿童保护儿科医生的角色:专家与倡导者。
J Paediatr Child Health. 2007 Jan-Feb;43(1-2):34-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1754.2007.00999.x.
9
Selection system for forensic expert witness and their qualification in Japan.日本法医专家证人的遴选制度及其资格
Leg Med (Tokyo). 2003 Mar;5 Suppl 1:S58-9. doi: 10.1016/s1344-6223(02)00089-5.
10
Professional disciplinary proceedings against expert medical witnesses.针对医学专家证人的专业纪律处分程序。
J Law Med. 2007 Feb;14(3):306-14.

引用本文的文献

1
Ten Percent of SIDS Cases are Murder - or are They?百分之十的婴儿猝死综合征案例是谋杀——或者真的如此吗?
Acad Forensic Pathol. 2017 Jun;7(2):163-170. doi: 10.23907/2017.018. Epub 2017 Jun 1.