Li Yong, Levin Oron, Forner-Cordero Arturo, Ronsse Renaud, Swinnen Stephan P
Laboratory of Motor Control, Research Center for Movement Control and Neuroplasticity, Department of Biomedical Kinesiology, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, KU Leuven, Tervuursevest 101, 3001 Heverlee, Belgium.
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2009 Mar;130(3):183-95. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2008.12.003. Epub 2009 Jan 22.
The present study examined the principles underlying inter and intralimb coordination constraints during performance of bimanual elbow-wrist movements at different cycling frequencies (from 0.75 Hz to 2.50 Hz). Participants performed eight coordination tasks that consisted of a combination of in-phase (IN) and/or anti-phase (AN) coordination modes between both elbows and wrists (interlimb), with isodirectional (Iso) or non-isodirectional (NonI) coordination modes within each limb (intralimb). As expected, the principle of muscle homology (in-phase coordination), giving rise to mirror symmetrical movements with respect to the mid-sagittal plane, had a powerful influence on the quality of global coordinative behavior both between and within limbs. When this principle was violated (i.e., when the anti-phase mode was introduced in one or both joint pairs), the non-isodirectional intralimb mode exhibited a (de)stabilizing role in coordination, which became more pronounced at higher cycling frequencies. However, pattern loss with increasing cycling frequency resulted not only in convergence toward the more stable in-phase patterns with the elbows and wrists but also to the anti-phase patterns (which were associated with directional compatibility of within-limb motions). Moreover, participants generally preserved their initial mode of coordination (either in-phase or anti-phase) in the proximal joints (i.e., elbows) while shifting from anti-phase to in-phase (or vice versa) with their distal joint pair (i.e., wrists). Taken together, these findings reflect the impact of two immanent types of symmetry in bimanual coordination: mirror-image and translational symmetry.
本研究考察了在不同骑行频率(从0.75赫兹到2.50赫兹)下进行双手肘腕运动时,肢体间和肢体内部协调约束背后的原理。参与者执行了八项协调任务,这些任务由双肘和双腕之间的同相(IN)和/或反相(AN)协调模式(肢体间)的组合,以及每个肢体内部的同向(Iso)或非同向(NonI)协调模式组成。正如预期的那样,肌肉同源性原则(同相协调)导致相对于中矢状面的镜像对称运动,对肢体间和肢体内部的整体协调行为质量产生了强大影响。当这一原则被违反时(即当在一个或两个关节对中引入反相模式时),非同向肢体内部模式在协调中表现出(去)稳定作用,在更高的骑行频率下这种作用变得更加明显。然而,随着骑行频率增加而出现的模式丢失不仅导致向肘部和腕部更稳定的同相模式收敛,也导致向反相模式收敛(这与肢体内部运动的方向兼容性相关)。此外,参与者通常在近端关节(即肘部)保持其初始协调模式(同相或反相),而在远端关节对(即腕部)从反相转变为同相(反之亦然)。综上所述,这些发现反映了双手协调中两种内在对称类型的影响:镜像对称和平移对称。