Robinson Katherine M, Dubé Adam K
Department of Psychology, Campion College, University of Regina, Sask., Canada.
J Exp Child Psychol. 2009 Aug;103(4):532-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2008.12.002. Epub 2009 Jan 22.
After the onset of formal schooling, little is known about the development of children's understanding of the arithmetic concepts of inversion and associativity. On problems of the form a+b-b (e.g., 3+26-26), if children understand the inversion concept (i.e., that addition and subtraction are inverse operations), then no calculations are needed to solve the problem. On problems of the form a+b-c (e.g., 3+27-23), if children understand the associativity concept (i.e., that the addition and subtraction can be solved in any order), then the second part of the problem can be solved first. Children in Grades 2, 3, and 4 solved both types of problems and then were given a demonstration of how to apply both concepts. Approval of each concept and preference of a conceptual approach versus an algorithmic approach were measured. Few grade differences were found on either task. Conceptual understanding was greater for inversion than for associativity on both tasks. Clusters of participants in all grades showed that some had strong understanding of both concepts, some had strong understanding of the inversion concept only, and others had weak understanding of both concepts. The findings highlight the lack of developmental increases and the large individual differences in conceptual understanding on two arithmetic concepts during the early school years.
在开始接受正规学校教育之后,对于儿童对反演和结合性这两个算术概念理解的发展情况,我们所知甚少。对于a + b - b这种形式的问题(例如3 + 26 - 26),如果儿童理解反演概念(即加法和减法是逆运算),那么解决这个问题就无需进行计算。对于a + b - c这种形式的问题(例如3 + 27 - 23),如果儿童理解结合性概念(即加法和减法可以按任意顺序求解),那么可以先解决问题的第二部分。二、三、四年级的学生解决了这两类问题,然后接受了关于如何应用这两个概念的演示。测量了对每个概念的认可程度以及对概念性方法与算法方法的偏好。在这两项任务中,年级差异都不明显。在这两项任务中,对反演概念的概念性理解都比对结合性概念的理解更强。所有年级的参与者群体都表明,一些人对这两个概念都有很强的理解,一些人只对反演概念有很强的理解,而另一些人对这两个概念的理解都很弱。这些发现凸显了在小学早期,儿童对这两个算术概念的概念性理解缺乏发展性增长且个体差异很大。