Department of Pediatrics, Kitasato University, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, Japan.
J Cardiol. 2009 Feb;53(1):15-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2008.08.002. Epub 2008 Sep 16.
We compared the clinical utility of additional intravenous immune globulin (IVIG) therapy with the clinical utility of steroid pulse therapy in patients with IVIG-resistant Kawasaki disease.
We enrolled 164 patients with Kawasaki disease who were treated with a single dose of IVIG (2 g/kg) and aspirin (30 mg/kg per day). Twenty-seven of these patients (16%) were resistant to the initial IVIG treatment. We compared the effectiveness of treatment strategies for the initial IVIG-resistant 27 patients, 14 of these patients were treated with additional IVIG therapy, and the other 13 patients were treated with steroid pulse therapy (methylprednisolone 30 mg/kg per day for 3 days).
Three patients in the group receiving additional IVIG treatment had coronary artery aneurysms (21.4%), no patients had coronary artery aneurysm in the steroid pulse therapy group; the difference in the incidence of coronary artery aneurysm was not statistically significant. The duration of high fever after additional treatment in the steroid pulse therapy group (1 ± 1.3 days) was significantly shorter than that in the additional IVIG treatment group (3 ± 2.4 days; P < 0.05). The medical costs were significantly lower in the steroid pulse therapy group than in the additional IVIG treatment group.
Steroid pulse therapy was useful to reduce the fever duration and medical costs for patients with Kawasaki disease. Steroid pulse therapy and additional IVIG treatment were not significantly different in terms of preventing the development of coronary artery aneurysm.
我们比较了在对静脉注射免疫球蛋白(IVIG)治疗无反应的川崎病患者中,额外给予 IVIG 治疗与激素冲击治疗的临床效果。
我们纳入了 164 例接受单剂 IVIG(2 g/kg)和阿司匹林(30 mg/kg/d)治疗的川崎病患者,其中 27 例(16%)对初始 IVIG 治疗无反应。我们比较了这 27 例初始 IVIG 无反应患者的治疗策略的有效性,其中 14 例接受了额外 IVIG 治疗,另外 13 例接受了激素冲击治疗(甲泼尼龙 30 mg/kg/d,连用 3 天)。
接受额外 IVIG 治疗的患者中有 3 例(21.4%)出现冠状动脉瘤,而激素冲击治疗组无患者出现冠状动脉瘤,两组间冠状动脉瘤的发生率差异无统计学意义。激素冲击治疗组在额外治疗后高热持续时间(1±1.3 天)明显短于额外 IVIG 治疗组(3±2.4 天;P<0.05)。激素冲击治疗组的医疗费用明显低于额外 IVIG 治疗组。
激素冲击治疗可缩短川崎病患者的发热持续时间和降低医疗费用。在预防冠状动脉瘤的发生方面,激素冲击治疗与额外 IVIG 治疗并无显著差异。