• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

早期子宫内膜癌的腹腔镜手术与开腹手术对比:一项随机对照试验的长期数据

Laparoscopic surgery vs laparotomy for early stage endometrial cancer: long-term data of a randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Zullo Fulvio, Palomba Stefano, Falbo Angela, Russo Tiziana, Mocciaro Rita, Tartaglia Eduardo, Tagliaferri Piersandro, Mastrantonio Pasquale

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Magna Graecia of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy.

出版信息

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Mar;200(3):296.e1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.10.056. Epub 2009 Jan 24.

DOI:10.1016/j.ajog.2008.10.056
PMID:19167698
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of the study was to compare the long-term safety and efficacy of laparoscopic surgery and laparotomy approaches to early stage endometrial cancer.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a prospective long-term extension study of a randomized controlled study that included 84 patients with clinical stage I endometrial cancer (laparoscopic surgery group, 40 women; laparotomy group, 38 women). Safety and efficacy data were evaluated and analyzed by the intention-to-treat principle.

RESULTS

After a follow-up period of 78 months (interquartile range, 7; range, 19-84 months) and 79 months (interquartile range, 6; range, 22-84 months) for laparoscopic surgery and laparotomy groups, respectively, no difference in the cumulative recurrence rates (8/40 [20.0%] and 7/38 [18.4%]; P = .860) and deaths (7/40 [17.5%] and 6/38 [15.8%] patients; P = .839) was detected between groups. No significant differences in overall (P = .535) and disease-free (P = .512) survival were observed.

CONCLUSION

The laparoscopic surgery approach to early stage endometrial cancer is as safe and effective a procedure as the laparotomy approach.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较腹腔镜手术和剖腹手术治疗早期子宫内膜癌的长期安全性和疗效。

研究设计

这是一项对一项随机对照研究的前瞻性长期扩展研究,该随机对照研究纳入了84例临床I期子宫内膜癌患者(腹腔镜手术组40例女性;剖腹手术组38例女性)。根据意向性分析原则对安全性和疗效数据进行评估和分析。

结果

腹腔镜手术组和剖腹手术组的随访期分别为78个月(四分位间距为7;范围为19 - 84个月)和79个月(四分位间距为6;范围为22 - 84个月),两组间累积复发率(8/40 [20.0%]和7/38 [18.4%];P = 0.860)和死亡率(7/40 [17.5%]和6/38 [15.8%]的患者;P = 0.839)均无差异。总生存期(P = 0.535)和无病生存期(P = 0.512)也未观察到显著差异。

结论

早期子宫内膜癌的腹腔镜手术治疗方法与剖腹手术治疗方法一样安全有效。

相似文献

1
Laparoscopic surgery vs laparotomy for early stage endometrial cancer: long-term data of a randomized controlled trial.早期子宫内膜癌的腹腔镜手术与开腹手术对比:一项随机对照试验的长期数据
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Mar;200(3):296.e1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.10.056. Epub 2009 Jan 24.
2
Laparoscopic versus open surgery for endometrial cancer: a minimum 3-year follow-up study.腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗子宫内膜癌的比较:一项至少 3 年随访研究。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2010 Jan;17(1):271-8. doi: 10.1245/s10434-009-0720-1. Epub 2009 Oct 14.
3
A prospective randomized comparison between laparoscopic and laparotomic approaches in women with early stage endometrial cancer: a focus on the quality of life.早期子宫内膜癌女性腹腔镜与开腹手术入路的前瞻性随机对照研究:聚焦生活质量
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Oct;193(4):1344-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.02.131.
4
Analysis of survival after laparoscopic management of endometrial cancer.子宫内膜癌腹腔镜治疗后的生存分析。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2008 Mar-Apr;15(2):181-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2007.10.006.
5
Laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomy compared with abdominal hysterectomy in clinical stage I endometrial cancer: safety, recurrence, and long-term outcome.腹腔镜辅助阴式子宫切除术与腹式子宫切除术治疗临床I期子宫内膜癌的比较:安全性、复发情况及长期预后
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Mar;196(3):248.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.10.870.
6
Systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy vs. no lymphadenectomy in early-stage endometrial carcinoma: randomized clinical trial.早期子宫内膜癌系统性盆腔淋巴结清扫术与未行淋巴结清扫术的比较:随机临床试验
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008 Dec 3;100(23):1707-16. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djn397. Epub 2008 Nov 25.
7
Hysterectomy for obese women with endometrial cancer: laparoscopy or laparotomy?肥胖子宫内膜癌女性的子宫切除术:腹腔镜手术还是开腹手术?
Gynecol Oncol. 2000 Sep;78(3 Pt 1):329-35. doi: 10.1006/gyno.2000.5914.
8
Surgical management of early-stage endometrial cancer in the elderly: is laparoscopy feasible?老年早期子宫内膜癌的手术治疗:腹腔镜手术可行吗?
Gynecol Oncol. 2001 Dec;83(3):563-8. doi: 10.1006/gyno.2001.6463.
9
Analysis of survival after laparoscopy in women with endometrial carcinoma.子宫内膜癌女性腹腔镜检查后的生存分析。
Cancer. 2002 Nov 1;95(9):1894-901. doi: 10.1002/cncr.10928.
10
Laparoscopic treatment for endometrial cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).子宫内膜癌的腹腔镜治疗:随机对照试验的荟萃分析
Gynecol Oncol. 2009 Feb;112(2):415-21. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.09.014. Epub 2008 Oct 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of Laparoscopy and Laparotomy in the Treatment of Early Stage Endometrioid Endometrial Adenocarcinoma.腹腔镜手术与开腹手术治疗早期子宫内膜样子宫内膜腺癌的比较
Cureus. 2025 Feb 24;17(2):e79575. doi: 10.7759/cureus.79575. eCollection 2025 Feb.
2
Different surgical methods of hysterectomy for the management of endometrial cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.子宫内膜癌治疗中子宫切除术的不同手术方法:系统评价与网状Meta分析
Front Oncol. 2025 Jan 15;14:1524991. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1524991. eCollection 2024.
3
Cancer-field surgery for endometrial cancer by robotic peritoneal mesometrial resection and targeted compartmental lymphadenectomy (PMMR+TCL).
通过机器人腹膜子宫系膜切除术和靶向分区淋巴结清扫术(PMMR+TCL)进行子宫内膜癌的癌灶手术。
J Gynecol Oncol. 2025 Jan;36(1):e13. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2025.36.e13. Epub 2024 Jun 20.
4
Comparison of Long-Term Outcomes in Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer: Robotic Single-Site vs. Multiport Laparoscopic Surgery.早期子宫内膜癌长期结局的比较:机器人单孔手术与多孔腹腔镜手术
J Pers Med. 2024 Jun 4;14(6):601. doi: 10.3390/jpm14060601.
5
Surgical Treatment for Endometrial Cancer, Hysterectomy Performed via Minimally Invasive Routes Compared with Open Surgery: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.子宫内膜癌的手术治疗:微创途径子宫切除术与开放手术的比较——系统评价与网状Meta分析
Cancers (Basel). 2024 May 13;16(10):1860. doi: 10.3390/cancers16101860.
6
Laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer is oncologically safe and improves hospital stay duration: a retrospective single-center study over a 16-year period.腹腔镜手术治疗子宫内膜癌在肿瘤学上是安全的,并能缩短住院时间:一项回顾性单中心研究超过 16 年的时间。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024 Aug;310(2):1207-1213. doi: 10.1007/s00404-024-07550-x. Epub 2024 May 25.
7
Laparoscopy with or without robotic assistance does not negatively impact long-term oncologic outcomes in patients with uterine serous carcinoma.腹腔镜手术联合或不联合机器人辅助并不影响子宫浆液性癌患者的长期肿瘤学结局。
Gynecol Oncol. 2023 Aug;175:8-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.05.064. Epub 2023 May 31.
8
Laparoscopic vs. open procedure for intermediate‑ and high‑risk endometrial cancer: a minimum 4-year follow-up analysis.腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗中高危子宫内膜癌:至少 4 年随访分析。
BMC Cancer. 2022 Nov 23;22(1):1203. doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-10301-3.
9
A Rehabilitation Model Conducive to Postoperative Recovery of Endometrial Cancer Patients after Laparoscopy.腹腔镜手术后有利于子宫内膜癌患者术后康复的康复模式。
Biomed Res Int. 2022 Sep 2;2022:9910841. doi: 10.1155/2022/9910841. eCollection 2022.
10
Prospective Multicenter Trial Assessing the Impact of Positive Peritoneal Cytology Conversion on Oncological Outcome in Patients with Endometrial Cancer Undergoing Minimally Invasive Surgery with the use of an Intrauterine Manipulator : Positive Peritoneal Cytology Conversion and Its Association with Oncological Outcome in Endometrial Cancer.前瞻性多中心试验评估使用宫内操作器行微创手术的子宫内膜癌患者腹膜细胞学阳性转化对肿瘤学结局的影响:子宫内膜癌腹膜细胞学阳性转化及其与肿瘤学结局的关系。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2022 Dec;29(13):8320-8333. doi: 10.1245/s10434-022-12356-9. Epub 2022 Sep 4.