Birngruber Christoph, Ramsthaler Frank, Verhoff Marcel A
Department of Legal Medicine, University of Giessen, Frankfurter Strasse 58, D-35392 Giessen, Germany.
Forensic Sci Int. 2009 Mar 10;185(1-3):e19-23. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2008.12.018. Epub 2009 Jan 24.
Human hair is among the most common kind of evidence secured at crime scenes. Although DNA analysis through STR-typing is possible in principle, it is not very promising for telogenic hair or single hairs. For the mixed traces frequently found in practice, composed of different hair from an unknown number of individuals, mtDNA sequencing of each individual hair seems to be the only possible, even if technically elaborate, solution. If it were possible to pool all hair belonging to an individual prior to DNA analysis, then this effort could not only be reduced, but the number of hair for an STR-approach could also be increased. Although it is possible to examine hair microscopically, this method must be considered unsuitable for pooling, since the results depend strongly on examiner experience, and the hair cannot always be correctly attributed to an individual. The goal of this study was to develop an objective non-DNA-contaminative pooling method for hair. To this end, the efficacy of spectral imaging as a method of obtaining information--beyond that obtained from a purely microscopic and morphological approach--for the identification of individuals was investigated. Three hairs each from 25 test persons (female: 18; male: 7) were examined with a SpectraCube-System and a light microscope. Six spectra were calculated for each hair, and the hairs from each individual were not only compared to each other, but also to those of the other individuals. From a forensic vantage, the examination showed, in particular, that individuals, whose hair could not be distinguished on the basis of morphology, could also not be accurately distinguished with the SpectraCube. The intra-individual differences were, in part, greater than the inter-individual differences. Altogether, the study shows that a person's hair color, as perceived, is composed of many naturally different, individual colors.
人类毛发是犯罪现场获取的最常见证据类型之一。虽然原则上通过STR分型进行DNA分析是可行的,但对于休止期毛发或单根毛发来说,前景并不乐观。对于实际中经常发现的由未知数量个体的不同毛发组成的混合痕迹,对每根毛发进行线粒体DNA测序似乎是唯一可行的解决方案,即使在技术上较为复杂。如果在DNA分析之前能够将属于同一个体的所有毛发汇集在一起,那么不仅可以减少工作量,还可以增加用于STR分析的毛发数量。虽然可以通过显微镜检查毛发,但这种方法不适合汇集毛发,因为结果很大程度上取决于检查人员的经验,而且毛发并不总是能够正确归属于某一个体。本研究的目的是开发一种客观的、不污染DNA的毛发汇集方法。为此,研究了光谱成像作为一种获取信息的方法(除了从纯粹的显微镜和形态学方法中获得的信息之外)用于个体识别的效果。使用SpectraCube系统和光学显微镜对25名测试人员(女性:18名;男性:7名)每人的三根毛发进行了检查。为每根毛发计算了六个光谱,不仅将每个个体的毛发相互比较,还与其他个体的毛发进行了比较。从法医的角度来看,检查尤其表明,那些根据形态无法区分毛发的个体,使用SpectraCube也无法准确区分。个体内部的差异在某些情况下大于个体之间的差异。总的来说,该研究表明,人们所感知的头发颜色是由许多自然存在的、不同的个体颜色组成的。