• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项由护士、营养师和教育工作者主导的小组护理对2型糖尿病管理的随机对照临床试验。

A randomised controlled clinical trial of nurse-, dietitian- and pedagogist-led Group Care for the management of Type 2 diabetes.

作者信息

Trento M, Basile M, Borgo E, Grassi G, Scuntero P, Trinetta A, Cavallo F, Porta M

机构信息

Laboratory of Clinical Pedagogy, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.

出版信息

J Endocrinol Invest. 2008 Nov;31(11):1038-42. doi: 10.1007/BF03345645.

DOI:10.1007/BF03345645
PMID:19169063
Abstract

AIM

To verify if Group Care, a model to manage Type 2 diabetes (T2DM) by systemic continuing group education, can be administered by nurses and dieticians under pedagogic guidance, and improve metabolic control, quality of life, Locus of Control, and insulin resistance.

MATERIAL AND SUBJECTS

Twenty-five patients with non-insulin-treated T2DM were randomized to Group Care and 24 to continued habitual individual care and education delivered by a diabetes specialist and pedagogist, respectively. Six nurses and 1 dietician received training by an accredited programme, a detailed operating manual and pedagogical supervision throughout the study. Follow-up was for 2 yr and included measurements of fasting blood glucose, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), body mass index, waist circumference, lipids, creatinine, blood pressure, serum insulin, homeostasis model assessment (HOMA) index of insulin resistance, health behaviors, quality of life, state and trait anxiety, and Locus of Control.

RESULTS

One patient on Group Care and 3 controls dropped out. At the end of study, the patients on Group Care had lower HbA1c (7.6+/-0.8 vs 8.4+/-1.3, p<0.05), insulin (18.0+/-9.6 vs 24.3+/-13.7, p<0.001), HOMA index (6.9+/-5.4 vs 9.2+/-6.6, p<0.05), and fatalistic attitude (17.2+/-5.9 vs 24.9+/-4.2, p<0.001) and better quality of life (65.0+/-11.0 vs 78.4+/-19.6, p<0.001) than controls.

CONCLUSIONS

Group Care delivered by trained nurses and dietitian is associated with better outcomes than those obtained by a medically and pedagogically qualified team. It may offer a model for health operators to re-organize clinical practice and for patients to improve lifestyle and strengthen the therapeutic alliance with their carers.

摘要

目的

验证“团体照护”这一通过系统性持续团体教育来管理2型糖尿病(T2DM)的模式,能否在教育学指导下由护士和营养师实施,并改善代谢控制、生活质量、控制源和胰岛素抵抗。

材料与对象

25例非胰岛素治疗的T2DM患者被随机分为“团体照护”组,24例被分到继续接受由糖尿病专科医生和教育学家提供的常规个体护理和教育组。在整个研究过程中,6名护士和1名营养师接受了经认可的培训项目、一份详细的操作手册以及教育学监督。随访为期2年,包括测量空腹血糖、糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)、体重指数、腰围、血脂、肌酐、血压、血清胰岛素、胰岛素抵抗的稳态模型评估(HOMA)指数、健康行为、生活质量、状态焦虑和特质焦虑以及控制源。

结果

“团体照护 ”组有1例患者退出,对照组有3例退出。研究结束时,“团体照护 ”组患者的HbA1c(7.6±0.8 vs 8.4±1.3,p<0.05)、胰岛素(18.0±9.6 vs 24.3±13.7,p<0.001)、HOMA指数(6.9±5.4 vs 9.2±6.6,p<0.05)和宿命论态度(17.2±5.9 vs 24.9±4.2,p<0.001)均低于对照组,生活质量(65.0±11.0 vs 78.4±19.6,p<0.001)则优于对照组。

结论

由经过培训的护士和营养师提供的“团体照护 ”比由医学和教育学资质团队获得更好的效果。它可能为健康从业者重新组织临床实践以及为患者改善生活方式和加强与护理人员的治疗联盟提供一种模式。

相似文献

1
A randomised controlled clinical trial of nurse-, dietitian- and pedagogist-led Group Care for the management of Type 2 diabetes.一项由护士、营养师和教育工作者主导的小组护理对2型糖尿病管理的随机对照临床试验。
J Endocrinol Invest. 2008 Nov;31(11):1038-42. doi: 10.1007/BF03345645.
2
Effectiveness of medical nutrition treatment delivered by dietitians on glycaemic outcomes and lipid profiles of Arab, Omani patients with Type 2 diabetes.营养师提供的医学营养治疗对阿拉伯、阿曼 2 型糖尿病患者血糖控制和血脂谱的影响。
Diabet Med. 2012 Feb;29(2):236-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2011.03405.x.
3
Multistrategic approach to improve quality of care of people with diabetes at the primary care level: Study design and baseline data.在初级保健层面改善糖尿病患者护理质量的多策略方法:研究设计与基线数据
Prim Care Diabetes. 2017 Apr;11(2):193-200. doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2016.12.002. Epub 2017 Jan 5.
4
Short-term intensive insulin therapy could be the preferred option for new onset Type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with HbA1c > 9.对于新诊断的糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)>9%的 2 型糖尿病患者,短期强化胰岛素治疗可能是首选。
J Diabetes. 2017 Oct;9(10):890-893. doi: 10.1111/1753-0407.12581. Epub 2017 Aug 22.
5
Structured, intensive education maximising engagement, motivation and long-term change for children and young people with diabetes: a cluster randomised controlled trial with integral process and economic evaluation - the CASCADE study.结构化、强化教育最大限度地提高糖尿病患儿和青少年的参与度、积极性和长期改变:一项具有整体过程和经济评估的群组随机对照试验 - CASCADE 研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2014 Mar;18(20):1-202. doi: 10.3310/hta18200.
6
BetaMe: impact of a comprehensive digital health programme on HbA1c and weight at 12 months for people with diabetes and pre-diabetes: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.BetaMe:一项综合数字健康计划对糖尿病和糖尿病前期患者12个月时糖化血红蛋白和体重的影响:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2018 Mar 5;19(1):161. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2528-4.
7
Effect of Diabetes Sleep Education for T2DM Who Sleep After Midnight: A Pilot Study from China.针对午夜后入睡的2型糖尿病患者的糖尿病睡眠教育效果:一项来自中国的试点研究。
Metab Syndr Relat Disord. 2018 Feb;16(1):13-19. doi: 10.1089/met.2017.0069. Epub 2018 Jan 22.
8
Effectiveness of medical nutrition therapy provided by dietitians in the management of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus: a randomized, controlled clinical trial.营养师提供的医学营养治疗对非胰岛素依赖型糖尿病管理的有效性:一项随机对照临床试验。
J Am Diet Assoc. 1995 Sep;95(9):1009-17. doi: 10.1016/S0002-8223(95)00276-6.
9
Quarterly individual outpatients lifestyle counseling after initial inpatients education on type 2 diabetes: the REDIA Prev-2 randomized controlled trial in Reunion Island.在对 2 型糖尿病患者进行初始住院教育后,每季度进行一次个体门诊生活方式咨询:留尼汪岛 REDIA Prev-2 随机对照试验。
Diabetes Metab. 2012 Feb;38(1):46-53. doi: 10.1016/j.diabet.2011.07.002. Epub 2011 Oct 24.
10
Beneficial effects of green banana biomass consumption in patients with pre-diabetes and type 2 diabetes: a randomised controlled trial.食用绿香蕉生物量对糖尿病前期和 2 型糖尿病患者的有益影响:一项随机对照试验。
Br J Nutr. 2019 Jun;121(12):1365-1375. doi: 10.1017/S0007114519000576. Epub 2019 Mar 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness of a dietician-led intervention in reducing glycated haemoglobin among people with type 2 diabetes in Nepal: a single centre, open-label, randomised controlled trial.营养师主导的干预措施对降低尼泊尔2型糖尿病患者糖化血红蛋白水平的有效性:一项单中心、开放标签、随机对照试验。
Lancet Reg Health Southeast Asia. 2023 Sep 25;18:100285. doi: 10.1016/j.lansea.2023.100285. eCollection 2023 Nov.
2
Quality improvement strategies for diabetes care: Effects on outcomes for adults living with diabetes.糖尿病护理质量改进策略:对成年糖尿病患者结局的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 May 31;5(5):CD014513. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014513.
3

本文引用的文献

1
National standards for diabetes self-management education.糖尿病自我管理教育国家标准。
Diabetes Care. 2008 Jan;31 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S97-104. doi: 10.2337/dc08-S097.
2
Healthy coping, negative emotions, and diabetes management: a systematic review and appraisal.健康应对、负面情绪与糖尿病管理:一项系统综述与评估
Diabetes Educ. 2007 Nov-Dec;33(6):1080-103; discussion 1104-6. doi: 10.1177/0145721707309808.
3
Evaluation of the locus of control in patients with type 2 diabetes after long-term management by group care.
Cost-effectiveness of multicomponent interventions in type 2 diabetes mellitus in a cluster randomised controlled trial: the INDICA study.
多组分干预在 2 型糖尿病中的成本效益:INDICA 研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Apr 8;12(4):e058049. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058049.
4
Dietary Management of Type 2 Diabetes in the MENA Region: A Review of the Evidence.中东和北非地区 2 型糖尿病的饮食管理:证据回顾。
Nutrients. 2021 Mar 24;13(4):1060. doi: 10.3390/nu13041060.
5
Dietitians' experiences and perspectives regarding access to and delivery of dietetic services for people with type 2 diabetes mellitus.营养师对于2型糖尿病患者获得和接受营养服务的经历与观点。
Heliyon. 2020 Feb 6;6(2):e03344. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03344. eCollection 2020 Feb.
6
The dietetic workforce distribution geographic atlas provides insight into the inequitable access for dietetic services for people with type 2 diabetes in Australia.饮食治疗师劳动力分布地理图集提供了澳大利亚 2 型糖尿病患者获得饮食治疗服务机会不均等的深入了解。
Nutr Diet. 2020 Feb;77(1):121-130. doi: 10.1111/1747-0080.12603. Epub 2020 Jan 19.
7
Feasibility and efficacy of nurse-led team management intervention for improving the self-management of type 2 diabetes patients in a Chinese community: a randomized controlled trial.护士主导的团队管理干预对改善中国社区2型糖尿病患者自我管理的可行性和有效性:一项随机对照试验
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2019 Aug 14;13:1353-1362. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S213645. eCollection 2019.
8
Brief Report: Integration of PrEP Services Into Routine Antenatal and Postnatal Care: Experiences From an Implementation Program in Western Kenya.简报:将 PrEP 服务整合到常规产前和产后护理中:来自肯尼亚西部实施计划的经验。
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2018 Dec 15;79(5):590-595. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000001850.
9
Effect of Medical Nutrition Therapy for Patients With Type 2 Diabetes in a Low-/No-Cost Clinic: A Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study.低成本/无成本诊所中2型糖尿病患者医学营养治疗的效果:一项倾向评分匹配队列研究
Diabetes Spectr. 2018 Feb;31(1):83-89. doi: 10.2337/ds16-0077.
10
Role of a registered dietitian in pediatric type 1 and type 2 diabetes.注册营养师在儿童1型和2型糖尿病中的作用。
Transl Pediatr. 2017 Oct;6(4):365-372. doi: 10.21037/tp.2017.09.05.
Diabetes Metab. 2006 Feb;32(1):77-81. doi: 10.1016/s1262-3636(07)70250-1.
4
Control of cardiovascular risk factors in patients with type 2 diabetes and hypertension in a French national study (Phenomen).
Diabetes Metab. 2005 Nov;31(5):479-85. doi: 10.1016/s1262-3636(07)70219-7.
5
Interventions for improving adherence to treatment recommendations in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus.改善2型糖尿病患者治疗建议依从性的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Apr 18;2005(2):CD003638. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003638.pub2.
6
Quality of diabetes care in U.S. academic medical centers: low rates of medical regimen change.美国学术医疗中心的糖尿病护理质量:医疗方案变更率低。
Diabetes Care. 2005 Feb;28(2):337-442. doi: 10.2337/diacare.28.2.337.
7
A lesson learnt: the importance of modelling in randomized controlled trials for complex interventions in primary care.经验教训:在初级保健复杂干预措施的随机对照试验中建模的重要性。
Fam Pract. 2005 Feb;22(1):132-9. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmh704. Epub 2005 Jan 7.
8
A 5-year randomized controlled study of learning, problem solving ability, and quality of life modifications in people with type 2 diabetes managed by group care.一项针对通过集体护理管理的2型糖尿病患者学习、解决问题能力及生活质量改善情况的5年随机对照研究。
Diabetes Care. 2004 Mar;27(3):670-5. doi: 10.2337/diacare.27.3.670.
9
Provider-patient interaction in diabetes care: effects on patient self-care and outcomes. A systematic review.糖尿病护理中的医患互动:对患者自我护理及预后的影响。一项系统评价。
Patient Educ Couns. 2003 Sep;51(1):17-28. doi: 10.1016/s0738-3991(02)00122-2.
10
Lifestyle intervention by group care prevents deterioration of Type II diabetes: a 4-year randomized controlled clinical trial.通过小组护理进行生活方式干预可预防II型糖尿病恶化:一项为期4年的随机对照临床试验。
Diabetologia. 2002 Sep;45(9):1231-9. doi: 10.1007/s00125-002-0904-8. Epub 2002 Jul 11.