Suppr超能文献

腹腔镜袖状胃切除术与胃内球囊:一项病例对照研究。

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy versus intragastric balloon: a case-control study.

作者信息

Genco Alfredo, Cipriano Massimiliano, Materia Alberto, Bacci Vincenzo, Maselli Roberta, Musmeci Luca, Lorenzo Michele, Basso Nicola

机构信息

Medical School, Paride Stefanini Surgical Department, La Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2009 Aug;23(8):1849-53. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-0285-2. Epub 2009 Jan 24.

Abstract

AIM

To compare the efficacy of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and BioEnterics intragastric balloon (BIB) to lose weight and comorbidities after 12 months of follow-up before a more invasive bariatric procedure.

METHODS

From January 2004 to December 2006, 40 patients underwent laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) as a first step in biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch. Controls (n = 80) were selected based on charts of patients who, during the same period, underwent BioEnterics intragastric balloon therapy. In both groups we considered: length of procedure, hospital stay, intraoperative or endoscopic complications, postoperative or postendoscopic complications, comorbidities at baseline, after 6 months (time of BIB removal), and after 12 months from baseline, and weight loss parameters [weight in kg, percentage excess weight less (%EWL), body mass index (BMI), and percentage excess BMI loss (%EBL)]. Results are expressed as mean +/- standard deviation.

RESULTS

Mortality, intra- and postoperative complications (in LSG group), and intra- and postendoscopic complications (in BIB group) were absent. Mean operative time in the LSG group was 120 +/- 40 (range 60-200) min. Mean positioning time for BIB was 15 +/- 5 (range 10-25) min. BMI at baseline was 54.1 +/- 2.9 (range 45.1-55.9) kg/m(2) and 54.8 +/- 2.5 (range 45.1-56.2) kg/m(2) in BIB and LSG groups, respectively. At 6-month follow-up, mean BMI was 46.2 +/- 3.5 and 45.3 +/- 5.5 kg/m(2) in the BIB and LSG patients, respectively [p = not significant (ns)]. After 12 months BIB patients regained BMI, even if strictly followed with a diet regimen, while LSG patients continued to lose weight. Significant differences between groups were absent for the comorbidities considered.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and BioEnterics intragastric balloon are two valid options for producing weight loss as a first-step procedure. LSG has all the related risks of general anesthesia, laparoscopic surgery, and digestive anastomosis, whereas BIB presents a very low rate of minor complications, such as psychological intolerance. For all these reasons, at this time, BIB is considered a better option than LSG as a first-step procedure in the short term (12 months).

摘要

目的

比较腹腔镜袖状胃切除术(LSG)和BioEnterics胃内球囊(BIB)在更具侵入性的减肥手术前12个月随访期内的减肥效果及对合并症的影响。

方法

2004年1月至2006年12月,40例患者接受了腹腔镜袖状胃切除术(LSG)作为胆胰转流十二指肠转位术的第一步。对照组(n = 80)根据同期接受BioEnterics胃内球囊治疗的患者病历选取。两组均考虑:手术时长、住院时间、术中或内镜并发症、术后或内镜后并发症、基线时的合并症、6个月后(取出BIB的时间)以及基线后12个月时的合并症,以及减肥参数[体重(kg)、超重减轻百分比(%EWL)、体重指数(BMI)和超重BMI损失百分比(%EBL)]。结果以平均值±标准差表示。

结果

无死亡病例,(LSG组)无术中及术后并发症,(BIB组)无内镜下及内镜后并发症。LSG组平均手术时间为120±40(范围60 - 200)分钟。BIB的平均放置时间为15±5(范围10 - 25)分钟。BIB组和LSG组基线时的BMI分别为54.1±2.9(范围45.1 - 55.9)kg/m²和54.8±2.5(范围45.1 - 56.2)kg/m²。在6个月随访时,BIB组和LSG组患者的平均BMI分别为46.2±3.5和45.3±5.5 kg/m²[p =无显著性差异(ns)]。12个月后,即使严格遵循饮食方案,BIB组患者的BMI仍有所回升,而LSG组患者继续减重。所考虑的合并症在两组之间无显著差异。

结论

腹腔镜袖状胃切除术和BioEnterics胃内球囊作为第一步手术在减肥方面都是有效的选择。LSG具有全身麻醉、腹腔镜手术和消化道吻合的所有相关风险,而BIB的轻微并发症发生率极低,如心理不耐受。基于所有这些原因,目前在短期内(12个月),BIB被认为是比LSG更好的第一步手术选择。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验