Churchill Larry R
Center for Biomedical Ethics and Society, Vanderbilt University, 2525 West End Avenue, Nashville, TN 37203, USA.
Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2009 Feb 15;151C(1):6-12. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.c.30195.
Genetic diseases often raise issues of profound importance for human self-understanding, such as one's identity, the family or community to which one belongs, and one's future or destiny. These deeper questions have commonly been seen as the purview of religion and spirituality. This essay explores how religion and spirituality are understood in the current US context and defined in the scholarly literature over the past 100 years. It is argued that a pragmatic, functional approach to religion and spirituality is important to understanding how patients respond to genetic diagnoses and participate in genetic therapies. A pragmatic, functional approach requires broadening the inquiry to include anything that provides a framework of transcendent meaning for the fundamental existential questions of human life. This approach also entails suspending questions about the truth claims of any particular religious/spiritual belief or practice. Three implications of adopting this broad working definition will be presented.
遗传疾病常常引发一些对人类自我认知具有深远重要性的问题,比如一个人的身份认同、所属的家庭或社群,以及个人的未来或命运。这些更深层次的问题通常被视为宗教和灵性的范畴。本文探讨了在当前美国背景下宗教和灵性是如何被理解的,以及在过去100年的学术文献中是如何被定义的。有人认为,对宗教和灵性采取务实、功能性的方法对于理解患者如何应对基因诊断以及参与基因治疗至关重要。务实、功能性的方法要求拓宽探究范围,将任何为人类生命的基本存在性问题提供超越性意义框架的事物都囊括进来。这种方法还意味着搁置关于任何特定宗教/灵性信仰或实践的真理主张的问题。将呈现采用这一宽泛工作定义的三个影响。