Raut S H, Varaiya A
Department of Microbiology, S.L.Raheja Hospital, Mahim, Mumbai-400 016, India.
Indian J Med Microbiol. 2009 Jan-Mar;27(1):55-8.
Difference in expression of putative virulence factors and in antifungal susceptibility among different Candida species has raised the need for species-level identification. The close relationship of Candida dubliniensis with C. albicans has led to misidentification of C. dubliniensis isolates as C. albicans. Phenotypic tests include ability to produce chlamydospore on casein agar, colony colour development on differential media CHROM agar Candida medium and ability to form hyphal fringe on Pal's agar, have been used to differentiate these two Candida species. Fifty isolates of Candida species were recovered from various specimens (blood, urine, tissue and respiratory secretions) from diabetic and cancer patients between April and July 2007. The isolates were tested for chlamydospore production on casein agar. These were also streaked simultaneously on CHROM agar, Pal's agar and a combination of CHROM agar supplemented with Pal's agar for identification and differentiation of C. dubliniensis from C. albicans. On CHROM agar, 19 isolates were identified as C. dubliniensis, nine as C. albicans, 10 as C. krusei, nine as C. tropicalis and two as C. glabrata. One was indeterminate and later identified as C. dubliniensis. Out of the 20 C. dubliniensis isolates, 19 isolates exhibited hyphal fringe on Pal's agar. On CHROM agar supplemented with Pal's agar, 16 out of the 19 fringe-positive isolates exhibited fringe surrounding the bluish green-coloured colonies of C. dubliniensis. Additional identification tests like growth at 45 degrees C and ability to reduce 2,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium chloride were time efficient, inexpensive and easy-to-use methods for differentiation of C. dubliniensis and C. albicans isolates. CHROM agar when supplemented with Pal's agar gave definitive identification between C. dubliniensis and C. albicans.
不同念珠菌属之间假定毒力因子表达及抗真菌药敏性的差异引发了对菌种水平鉴定的需求。都柏林念珠菌与白色念珠菌的密切关系导致都柏林念珠菌分离株被误鉴定为白色念珠菌。表型试验包括在酪蛋白琼脂上产生厚垣孢子的能力、在鉴别培养基CHROM琼脂念珠菌培养基上菌落颜色的变化以及在帕尔氏琼脂上形成菌丝边缘的能力,已被用于区分这两种念珠菌。2007年4月至7月期间,从糖尿病和癌症患者的各种标本(血液、尿液、组织和呼吸道分泌物)中分离出50株念珠菌。对这些分离株进行酪蛋白琼脂上厚垣孢子产生的检测。它们还同时接种在CHROM琼脂、帕尔氏琼脂以及添加了帕尔氏琼脂的CHROM琼脂组合上,以鉴定和区分都柏林念珠菌与白色念珠菌。在CHROM琼脂上,19株分离株被鉴定为都柏林念珠菌,9株为白色念珠菌,10株为克鲁斯念珠菌,9株为热带念珠菌,2株为光滑念珠菌。1株无法确定,后来被鉴定为都柏林念珠菌。在20株都柏林念珠菌分离株中,19株在帕尔氏琼脂上表现出菌丝边缘。在添加了帕尔氏琼脂的CHROM琼脂上,19株边缘阳性分离株中有16株在都柏林念珠菌蓝绿色菌落周围表现出边缘。额外的鉴定试验,如在45℃生长以及还原2,3,5-三苯基氯化四氮唑的能力,是区分都柏林念珠菌和白色念珠菌分离株的省时、廉价且易于使用的方法。添加了帕尔氏琼脂的CHROM琼脂能明确鉴定都柏林念珠菌和白色念珠菌。