Suppr超能文献

腹腔镜辅助胃癌根治术学习曲线期间的短期疗效。

Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic-assisted distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer during a surgeon's learning curve period.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 108 Pyung-Dong, Jongno-Ku, Seoul, 110746, South Korea.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2009 Oct;23(10):2250-7. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-0315-0. Epub 2009 Jan 27.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) is gaining wider acceptance for treating early gastric cancer (EGC). However, many gastric surgeons are still reluctant to perform LADG, mainly because this procedure entails a considerable learning curve. We aimed to evaluate the technical feasibility and short-term outcomes of performing LADG by a single experienced gastric surgeon who initially had no experience with laparoscopic surgery as compared with open distal gastrectomy (ODG).

METHODS

Between January 2006 and December 2007, 177 patients with preoperatively diagnosed EGC located at the middle or lower third of the stomach were enrolled; 102 patients underwent LADG, 4 patients had open conversion, and 71 patients underwent conventional ODG. The operative and early postoperative outcomes from a prospective database were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

The clinicopathological characteristics were similar between the two groups. No operation-related deaths occurred. Although operation time was significantly longer for LADG than for ODG, time to first flatus was shorter and, consequently, postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter in the LADG group. There was no significant difference in the overall complication rates between the two groups. On comparing the early (n = 50) and late groups (n = 52) of LADG patients, operation time and postoperative hospital stay were shorter and number of retrieved lymph nodes was greater in the late group (p < 0.05). Major and minor complications were markedly reduced in the late group (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Although LADG was more time consuming than ODG, it was a feasible, safe procedure that accomplished the oncological requirements. Postoperative morbidity of LADG was similar to that of ODG, and LADG led to faster postoperative recovery. However, LADG should be performed carefully to prevent unexpected complications, especially during the early learning period.

摘要

背景

腹腔镜辅助远端胃切除术(LADG)在治疗早期胃癌(EGC)方面越来越被广泛接受。然而,许多胃外科医生仍然不愿意进行 LADG,主要是因为该手术需要相当长的学习曲线。我们旨在评估一位经验丰富的胃外科医生在没有腹腔镜手术经验的情况下进行 LADG 的技术可行性和短期结果,与开腹远端胃切除术(ODG)进行比较。

方法

2006 年 1 月至 2007 年 12 月期间,共有 177 例术前诊断为位于胃中下部的 EGC 的患者入组;其中 102 例患者行 LADG,4 例患者中转开腹,71 例患者行常规 ODG。从前瞻性数据库中比较两组的手术和早期术后结果。

结果

两组的临床病理特征相似。无手术相关死亡。尽管 LADG 的手术时间明显长于 ODG,但 LADG 组的首次排气时间较短,因此术后住院时间明显缩短。两组的总体并发症发生率无显著差异。在比较 LADG 患者的早期(n=50)和晚期(n=52)组时,晚期组的手术时间和术后住院时间更短,并且检索的淋巴结数量更多(p<0.05)。晚期组的主要和次要并发症明显减少(p<0.05)。

结论

虽然 LADG 比 ODG 耗时更多,但它是一种可行的、安全的手术,能够满足肿瘤学要求。LADG 的术后发病率与 ODG 相似,并且 LADG 导致更快的术后恢复。然而,在早期学习阶段,应小心进行 LADG 以防止意外并发症。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验