Suppr超能文献

美国机器人胃切除术治疗胃腺癌:220 例患者的见解和肿瘤学结果。

Robotic Gastrectomy for Gastric Adenocarcinoma in the USA: Insights and Oncologic Outcomes in 220 Patients.

机构信息

Departments of Surgery, Gastric and Mixed Tumor Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA.

Departments of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Feb;28(2):742-750. doi: 10.1245/s10434-020-08834-7. Epub 2020 Jul 11.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

While multiple Asian and a few Western retrospective series have demonstrated the feasibility and safety of robotic-assisted gastrectomy for gastric cancer, its reliability for thorough resection, especially for locoregional disease, has not yet been firmly established, and reported learning curves vary widely. To support wider implementation of robotic gastrectomy, we evaluated the learning curve for this approach, assessed its oncologic feasibility, and created a selection model predicting the likelihood of conversion to open surgery in a US patient population.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed data on all consecutive patients who underwent robotic gastrectomy at a high-volume institution between May 2012 and March 2019.

RESULTS

Of the 220 patients with gastric cancer selected to undergo curative-intent robotic gastrectomy, surgery was completed using robotics in 159 (72.3%). The median number of removed lymph nodes was 28, and ≥ 15 lymph nodes were removed in 94% of procedures. Surgical time decreased steadily over the first 60-80 cases. Complications were generally minor: 7% of patients experienced complications of grade 3 or higher, with an anastomotic leak rate of 2% and mortality rate 0.9%. Factors predicting conversion to open surgery included neoadjuvant chemotherapy, BMI ≥ 31 kg/m, and tumor size ≥ 6 cm.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings support the safety and oncologic feasibility of robotic gastrectomy for selected patients with gastric cancer. Proficiency can be achieved by 20 cases and mastery by 60-80 cases. Ideal candidates for this approach are patients with few comorbidities, BMI < 31 kg/m, and tumors < 6 cm.

摘要

背景

虽然多项亚洲和少数西方的回顾性研究已经证明了机器人辅助胃癌根治术的可行性和安全性,但它在彻底切除方面的可靠性,特别是对于局部区域疾病,尚未得到充分证实,且报道的学习曲线差异很大。为了支持更广泛地实施机器人胃切除术,我们评估了这种方法的学习曲线,评估了其肿瘤学可行性,并创建了一个选择模型,预测在美国患者人群中转开腹手术的可能性。

患者和方法

我们回顾性分析了 2012 年 5 月至 2019 年 3 月期间在一家高容量机构接受根治性机器人胃切除术的所有连续患者的数据。

结果

在 220 名被选中接受有治愈意图的机器人胃切除术的胃癌患者中,159 名(72.3%)手术成功完成。切除的淋巴结中位数为 28 个,94%的手术切除了≥15 个淋巴结。手术时间在最初的 60-80 例手术中稳步下降。并发症通常较轻:7%的患者出现 3 级或更高级别的并发症,吻合口漏的发生率为 2%,死亡率为 0.9%。预测转为开腹手术的因素包括新辅助化疗、BMI≥31kg/m2和肿瘤大小≥6cm。

结论

这些发现支持了机器人胃切除术在选定的胃癌患者中的安全性和肿瘤学可行性。通过 20 例手术可以达到熟练程度,通过 60-80 例手术可以达到精通程度。这种方法的理想候选者是患有较少合并症、BMI<31kg/m2和肿瘤<6cm的患者。

相似文献

1
Robotic Gastrectomy for Gastric Adenocarcinoma in the USA: Insights and Oncologic Outcomes in 220 Patients.
Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Feb;28(2):742-750. doi: 10.1245/s10434-020-08834-7. Epub 2020 Jul 11.
3
Outcomes of Gastric Resection in the Establishment of a Comprehensive Oncologic Robotic Program.
J Surg Res. 2020 Aug;252:30-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.01.023. Epub 2020 Mar 26.
4
[Comparison of short-term efficacy between robotic and 3D laparoscopic-assisted D2 radical distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer].
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Apr 25;23(4):350-356. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn.441530-20200224-00085.
5
Minimally invasive surgery for gastric cancer: the American experience.
Gastric Cancer. 2017 Mar;20(2):368-378. doi: 10.1007/s10120-016-0605-5. Epub 2016 Mar 9.
6
Rapid and safe learning of robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: multidimensional analysis in a comparison with laparoscopic gastrectomy.
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2014 Oct;40(10):1346-54. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2013.09.011. Epub 2013 Sep 17.
8
[Long-term efficacy of robotic radical total gastrectomy for gastric cancer and analysis of prognostic factors].
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Apr 25;23(4):357-363. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn.441530-20200113-00021.
10
Robotic D2 Lymph Node Dissection During Distal Subtotal Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: Toward Procedural Standardization.
Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 Aug;23(8):2409-10. doi: 10.1245/s10434-016-5166-7. Epub 2016 Mar 8.

引用本文的文献

1
A comprehensive overview of gastric cancer management from a surgical point of view.
Biomed J. 2024 Nov 18:100817. doi: 10.1016/j.bj.2024.100817.
3
Initiation of a robotic pancreatoduodenectomy program using virtual collaboration.
HPB (Oxford). 2024 Dec;26(12):1528-1535. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2024.09.001. Epub 2024 Sep 3.
4
Cost Analysis for Robotic and Open Gastrectomy.
Ann Surg Open. 2024 Mar 5;5(1):e396. doi: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000396. eCollection 2024 Mar.
6
Trends of Oncological Quality of Robotic Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer in the United States.
World J Oncol. 2023 Oct;14(5):371-381. doi: 10.14740/wjon1657. Epub 2023 Sep 20.
7
Laparoscopic compared to open approach for distal gastrectomy may reduce pneumonia risk for patients with gastric cancer.
Surg Open Sci. 2023 Jul 20;14:68-74. doi: 10.1016/j.sopen.2023.07.006. eCollection 2023 Aug.
8
Early stage gastric adenocarcinoma: clinical and molecular landscapes.
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2023 Jul;20(7):453-469. doi: 10.1038/s41571-023-00767-w. Epub 2023 Jun 1.

本文引用的文献

3
Surgical Outcomes After Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer.
Ann Surg Oncol. 2017 Jul;24(7):1770-1777. doi: 10.1245/s10434-017-5851-1. Epub 2017 Mar 29.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验