Wenger Neil S, Roth Carol P, Shekelle Paul G, Young Roy T, Solomon David H, Kamberg Caren J, Chang John T, Louie Rachel, Higashi Takahiro, MacLean Catherine H, Adams John, Min Lillian C, Ransohoff Kurt, Hoffing Marc, Reuben David B
RAND, Santa Monica, California, USA.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2009 Mar;57(3):547-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.02128.x. Epub 2009 Jan 16.
To determine whether a practice-based intervention can improve care for falls, urinary incontinence, and cognitive impairment.
Controlled trial.
Two community medical groups.
Community-dwelling patients (357 at intervention sites and 287 at control sites) aged 75 and older identified as having difficulty with falls, incontinence, or cognitive impairment.
Intervention and control practices received condition case-finding, but only intervention practices received a multicomponent practice-change intervention.
Percentage of quality indicators satisfied measured using a 13-month medical record abstraction.
Before the intervention, the quality of care was the same in intervention and control groups. Screening tripled the number of patients identified as needing care for falls, incontinence, or cognitive impairment. During the intervention, overall care for the three conditions was better in the intervention than the control group (41%, 95% confidence interval (CI)=35-46% vs 25%, 95% CI=20-30%, P<.001). Intervention group patients received better care for falls (44% vs 23%, P<.001) and incontinence (37% vs 22%, P<.001) but not for cognitive impairment (44% vs 41%, P=.67) than control group patients. The intervention was more effective for conditions identified by screening than for conditions identified through usual care.
A practice-based intervention integrated into usual clinical care can improve primary care for falls and urinary incontinence, although even with the intervention, less than half of the recommended care for these conditions was provided. More-intensive interventions, such as embedding intervention components into an electronic medical record, will be needed to adequately improve care for falls and incontinence.
确定基于实践的干预措施能否改善对跌倒、尿失禁和认知障碍的护理。
对照试验。
两个社区医疗小组。
年龄在75岁及以上、被确定存在跌倒、失禁或认知障碍困难的社区居住患者(干预组357例,对照组287例)。
干预组和对照组均进行病情病例筛查,但只有干预组接受多成分实践改变干预。
使用13个月的病历摘要测量质量指标的达标百分比。
干预前,干预组和对照组的护理质量相同。筛查使被确定需要跌倒、失禁或认知障碍护理的患者数量增加了两倍。在干预期间,干预组对这三种情况的总体护理优于对照组(41%,95%置信区间(CI)=35 - 46% 对比 25%,95% CI = 20 - 30%,P <.001)。干预组患者在跌倒护理方面(44%对比23%,P <.001)和失禁护理方面(37%对比22%,P <.001)比对照组患者更好,但在认知障碍护理方面(44%对比41%,P =.67)与对照组患者相当。该干预措施对通过筛查确定的病情比通过常规护理确定的病情更有效。
融入常规临床护理的基于实践的干预措施可改善对跌倒和尿失禁的初级护理,尽管即使有干预措施,这些情况的推荐护理仍有不到一半得到提供。需要更强化的干预措施,如将干预成分嵌入电子病历,以充分改善对跌倒和失禁的护理。