Retnakaran Ravi, Qi Ying, Sermer Mathew, Connelly Philip W, Hanley Anthony J G, Zinman Bernard
Leadership Sinai Centre for Diabetes, Mount Sinai Hospital, Division of Endocrinology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2009 Aug;71(2):208-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.2008.03460.x. Epub 2008 Oct 21.
In pregnancy, a normal result on the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) that follows an abnormal screening glucose challenge test (GCT) is considered a reassuring finding, requiring no further intervention. The obstetrical and metabolic implications of this presentation, however, have not been well studied. Thus, we sought to characterize the obstetrical and postpartum metabolic significance of an abnormal GCT in women with normal glucose tolerance (NGT) on antepartum OGTT.
DESIGN/PATIENTS/MEASUREMENTS: A total of 259 women with NGT on antepartum OGTT (166 with an abnormal GCT and 93 with a normal GCT) underwent (i) metabolic evaluation in pregnancy, (ii) assessment of obstetrical outcome at delivery and (iii) repeat metabolic characterization by OGTT at 3 months postpartum.
Neither infant birthweight nor Caesarean section rate differed between the abnormal GCT and normal GCT groups. At 3 months postpartum, however, compared to the normal GCT group, the abnormal GCT group exhibited greater glycaemia (mean area under the glucose curve (AUC(gluc)) 19.6 vs. 18.3, P = 0.0021), lower insulin sensitivity (median insulin sensitivity index (IS(OGTT)) 9.5 vs. 11.3, P = 0.0243) and poorer beta-cell function (median insulinogenic index/Homeostasis Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR) 9.8 vs. 14.1, P = 0.0013). On multiple linear regression analyses, an abnormal GCT emerged as (i) the strongest independent predictor of postpartum AUC(gluc) (t = 2.77, P = 0.006) and (ii) the strongest independent negative predictor of log insulinogenic index/HOMA-IR (t = -2.36, P = 0.0191). Furthermore, the GCT was the antepartum parameter that best predicted postpartum pre-diabetes (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AROC) = 0.754).
An abnormal antepartum GCT, even when followed by a normal OGTT, is associated with postpartum glycaemia and beta-cell dysfunction, factors that may portend an increased future risk of diabetes in this patient population.
在孕期,口服葡萄糖耐量试验(OGTT)结果正常而筛查葡萄糖耐量试验(GCT)结果异常被认为是一个令人安心的发现,无需进一步干预。然而,这种情况的产科及代谢影响尚未得到充分研究。因此,我们试图描述产前OGTT葡萄糖耐量正常(NGT)的女性中异常GCT的产科及产后代谢意义。
设计/研究对象/测量指标:共有259名产前OGTT葡萄糖耐量正常的女性(166名GCT异常,93名GCT正常)接受了以下检查:(i)孕期代谢评估;(ii)分娩时产科结局评估;(iii)产后3个月通过OGTT进行重复代谢特征分析。
异常GCT组与正常GCT组的婴儿出生体重及剖宫产率均无差异。然而,产后3个月时,与正常GCT组相比,异常GCT组血糖更高(平均葡萄糖曲线下面积(AUC(gluc))19.6对18.3,P = 0.0021),胰岛素敏感性更低(胰岛素敏感性指数中位数(IS(OGTT))9.5对11.3,P = 0.0243),β细胞功能更差(胰岛素生成指数/胰岛素抵抗稳态模型评估(HOMA-IR)中位数9.8对14.1,P = 0.0013)。在多元线性回归分析中,异常GCT成为:(i)产后AUC(gluc)的最强独立预测因素(t = 2.77,P = 0.006);(ii)对数胰岛素生成指数/HOMA-IR的最强独立负向预测因素(t = -2.36,P = 0.0191)。此外,GCT是预测产后糖尿病前期的最佳产前参数(受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AROC)= 0.754)。
产前GCT异常,即使随后OGTT结果正常,也与产后血糖及β细胞功能障碍有关,这些因素可能预示该患者群体未来患糖尿病的风险增加。