Division of Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Medicine (Solna), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2023 Jun;102(6):699-707. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14554. Epub 2023 Mar 25.
Fetal growth assessment by ultrasound is an essential part of modern obstetric care. The formula by Persson and Weldner for estimated fetal weight (EFW), used in Sweden since decades, has not yet been evaluated. The objective of this study was to evaluate accuracy and precision of the formula by Persson and Weldner, and to compare it to two other formulae using biparietal diameter instead of head circumference.
The study population consisted of 31 521 singleton pregnancies delivered at 22 gestational weeks or later, with an ultrasound EFW performed within 2 days before delivery, registered in the Swedish Pregnancy Register between 2014 and 2021. Fetal biometric ultrasound measurements were used to calculate EFW according to the formulae by Persson and Weldner, Hadlock 2 and Shepard. Bland-Altman analysis, systematic error (mean percentage error), random error (standard deviation [SD] of mean percentage error), proportion of weight estimates within ±10% of birthweight, and proportion with underestimated and overestimated weight was calculated. Moreover, calculations were made after stratification into small, appropriate, and large for gestational age (SGA, AGA and LGA), respectively, and gestational age at examination.
For the formula by Persson and Weldner, MPE was -2.7 (SD 8.9) and the proportion of EFW within ±10% from actual birthweight was 76.0%. MPE was largest for fetuses estimated as severe SGA (<3rd percentile, -5.4) and for the most preterm fetuses (<24 weeks, -5.4). For Hadlock 2 and Shepard's formulae, MPE were 3.9 (SD 8.9) and 3.4 (SD 9.7), respectively, and the proportions of EFW within ±10% from actual birthweight were 69.4% and 67.1%, respectively. MPE was largest for fetuses estimated as severe LGA (>97th percentile), 7.6 and 9.4, respectively.
The recommended Swedish formula by Persson and Weldner is generally accurate for fetal weight estimation. The systematic underestimation of EFW and random error is largest in extreme preterm and estimated SGA-fetuses, which is of importance in clinical decision making. The accuracy of EFW with the formula by Persson and Weldner is as good as or better than Hadlock 2 and Shepard's formulae.
超声胎儿生长评估是现代产科护理的重要组成部分。几十年来,瑞典一直在使用 Persson 和 Weldner 公式来估计胎儿体重(EFW),但该公式尚未得到评估。本研究的目的是评估 Persson 和 Weldner 公式的准确性和精密度,并将其与另外两个使用双顶径而不是头围的公式进行比较。
该研究人群包括 2014 年至 2021 年间在瑞典妊娠登记处登记的 31521 例单胎妊娠,在妊娠 22 周或以上分娩,在分娩前 2 天内进行了超声 EFW 检查。使用胎儿超声生物测量值根据 Persson 和 Weldner、Hadlock 2 和 Shepard 公式计算 EFW。采用 Bland-Altman 分析、系统误差(平均百分比误差)、随机误差(平均百分比误差的标准差)、体重估计值在出生体重的±10%范围内的比例以及低估和高估体重的比例。此外,还分别对小、适当和大胎龄儿(SGA、AGA 和 LGA)和检查时的胎龄进行了分层计算。
对于 Persson 和 Weldner 公式,平均百分比误差为-2.7(标准差 8.9),实际出生体重的 EFW 比例在±10%范围内为 76.0%。对于估计为严重 SGA(<第 3 百分位,-5.4)和最早产的胎儿(<24 周,-5.4),MPE 最大。对于 Hadlock 2 和 Shepard 公式,平均百分比误差分别为 3.9(标准差 8.9)和 3.4(标准差 9.7),实际出生体重的 EFW 比例分别为 69.4%和 67.1%。对于估计为严重 LGA(>第 97 百分位)的胎儿,MPE 最大,分别为 7.6 和 9.4。
瑞典推荐的 Persson 和 Weldner 公式通常可准确估计胎儿体重。EFW 的系统低估和随机误差在极早产和估计的 SGA 胎儿中最大,这在临床决策中很重要。Persson 和 Weldner 公式的 EFW 准确性与 Hadlock 2 和 Shepard 公式一样好或更好。