Evan Gerard I, d'Adda di Fagagna Fabrizio
Department of Pathology and Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143-0502, USA.
Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2009 Feb;19(1):25-31. doi: 10.1016/j.gde.2008.11.009. Epub 2009 Jan 30.
The phenomenon of replicative senescence was first observed more than 40 years ago by Hayflick who noted the inability of cultured human fibroblasts to proliferate indefinitely. The recent discovery that cellular senescence is triggered by many different activated oncogenes has led to the notion that senescence, like oncogene-induced apoptosis, serves as a critical and cell-autonomous tumor preventive mechanism. Both the DNA damage response and the ARF tumor suppressor have been mechanistically implicated in oncogene-induced senescence and the relative contributions of, and potential interactions between, these two pathways remain subjects of a lively debate. More recently, the discovery that cellular senescence can be bypassed during the epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) that typically accompanies tumor progression, the observation that organ fibrosis is controlled by cellular senescence and, most noticeably, the mounting evidence linking cellular senescence to inflammation, make cellular senescence a still flaming hot subject after all these years.
复制性衰老现象早在40多年前就被海弗利克首次观察到,他注意到培养的人类成纤维细胞无法无限增殖。最近的发现表明,许多不同的激活癌基因会引发细胞衰老,这导致了一种观点,即衰老与癌基因诱导的凋亡一样,是一种关键的细胞自主肿瘤预防机制。DNA损伤反应和ARF肿瘤抑制因子在机制上都与癌基因诱导的衰老有关,这两条途径的相对贡献以及它们之间的潜在相互作用仍然是激烈争论的主题。最近,人们发现,在通常伴随肿瘤进展的上皮-间质转化(EMT)过程中,细胞衰老可以被绕过;观察到器官纤维化受细胞衰老控制;最值得注意的是,越来越多的证据将细胞衰老与炎症联系起来,这些都使得细胞衰老在这么多年后仍然是一个热门话题。