Kourliouros Antonios, Savelieva Irina, Kiotsekoglou Anatoli, Jahangiri Marjan, Camm John
Department of Cardiac Surgery, St George's University of London, United Kingdom.
Am Heart J. 2009 Feb;157(2):243-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2008.10.009. Epub 2008 Dec 24.
Current evidence suggests that the pathogenesis of atrial fibrillation (AF) is multifactorial. The observation that AF, once present, alters the electrophysiologic properties of the atrial myocardium causing self-perpetuation of the arrhythmia raised the importance of electrical remodeling in its pathogenesis. Although these changes are potentially reversible, maintenance of AF continues even after electrical remodeling has occurred. Clinical and experimental studies have highlighted the role of a susceptible atrial anatomical substrate with features of myocyte degeneration and interstitial fibrosis in the initiation and maintenance of AF. Finally, the association of increased inflammatory burden with the presence and future development of AF has implicated inflammation in the pathogenesis of the arrhythmia. The purpose of this review is to provide current evidence on the dominant theories on AF pathogenesis, namely, electrical remodeling, structural remodeling, and inflammation; describe the various experimental models and methods used; and identify a cause-effect association, when present. In addition, the interrelation between different mechanisms responsible for AF will be demonstrated, providing further insight into the complex pathophysiology.
目前的证据表明,心房颤动(AF)的发病机制是多因素的。一旦出现房颤,就会改变心房心肌的电生理特性,导致心律失常的自我持续,这一观察结果凸显了电重构在其发病机制中的重要性。尽管这些变化可能是可逆的,但即使在电重构发生后,房颤仍会持续。临床和实验研究强调了具有心肌细胞变性和间质纤维化特征的易患心房解剖学基质在房颤起始和维持中的作用。最后,炎症负担增加与房颤的存在和未来发展之间的关联表明炎症参与了心律失常的发病机制。本综述的目的是提供关于房颤发病机制的主要理论,即电重构、结构重构和炎症的当前证据;描述所使用的各种实验模型和方法;并确定存在因果关系时的因果关联。此外,还将展示导致房颤的不同机制之间的相互关系,从而进一步深入了解复杂的病理生理学。