Lee Robert A, Dommasch Erica, Treat James, Sciacca-Kirby Joslyn, Chachkin Samuel, Williams Jennifer, Shin Daniel B, Leyden James J, Vittorio Carmela, Gelfand Joel M
Department of Dermatology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA.
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2009 Apr;60(4):565-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2008.11.898. Epub 2009 Jan 31.
Medical therapies for hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) are often ineffective. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitors may be a potential treatment for patients with moderate to severe HS.
We sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of etanercept for patients with severe HS.
We conducted a phase II clinical trial of etanercept (50 mg/wk subcutaneously) in patients with moderate to severe HS. Efficacy was measured using a Physician Global Assessment and several secondary physician- and patient-reported outcome measures. Responders were classified as those achieving at least a 50% reduction on the Physician Global Assessment score at week 12 compared with baseline.
Only 3 of the 15 patients who entered the study were classified as responders (response rate of 20%; 95% confidence interval: 4.3-48.1) based on the intention-to-treat analysis. Dermatology Life Quality Index scores improved slightly from a median of 19 to 15 (P = .02). Comparison of baseline with week-12 Physician Global Assessment scores, and secondary outcome measures of lesion counts and patient pain scores, failed to show statistically significant improvement. Etanercept was generally well tolerated; however, two patients discontinued the study as a result of skin infections at the site of hidradenitis lesions requiring oral antibiotics.
Lack of a control group and a small number of participants are limitations.
Our study demonstrated minimal evidence of clinically significant efficacy of etanercept (50 mg/wk subcutaneously) in the treatment of hidradenitis. Future studies using higher doses of etanercept are indicated; however, patients need to be carefully monitored for infection and other adverse events. Randomized, controlled trials will be necessary to demonstrate the risk-to-benefit ratio of tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitors in the treatment of hidradenitis.
化脓性汗腺炎(HS)的药物治疗通常无效。肿瘤坏死因子-α抑制剂可能是中重度HS患者的一种潜在治疗方法。
我们旨在评估依那西普对重度HS患者的安全性和疗效。
我们对中重度HS患者进行了依那西普(50mg/周皮下注射)的II期临床试验。使用医生整体评估以及一些次要的医生和患者报告的结局指标来衡量疗效。根据意向性分析,将在第12周时与基线相比医生整体评估得分至少降低50%的患者分类为有反应者。
根据意向性分析,在进入研究的15名患者中,只有3名被分类为有反应者(反应率为20%;95%置信区间:4.3-48.1)。皮肤病生活质量指数评分从中位数19略有改善至15(P = 0.02)。将基线与第12周的医生整体评估得分以及皮损计数和患者疼痛评分的次要结局指标进行比较,未显示出统计学上的显著改善。依那西普总体耐受性良好;然而,两名患者因化脓性汗腺炎病变部位的皮肤感染需要口服抗生素而停止了研究。
缺乏对照组和参与者数量少是局限性。
我们的研究表明,依那西普(50mg/周皮下注射)治疗化脓性汗腺炎的临床显著疗效证据极少。表明未来需要使用更高剂量依那西普的研究;然而,需要仔细监测患者的感染和其他不良事件。有必要进行随机对照试验以证明肿瘤坏死因子-α抑制剂治疗化脓性汗腺炎的风险效益比。