Carson R C
Department of Psychology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27706.
J Abnorm Psychol. 1991 Aug;100(3):302-7. doi: 10.1037//0021-843x.100.3.302.
It is argued that the format for developing recent versions of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) taxonomy is constrained in ways that seriously impair the quality of the product. These constraints include inappropriate assumption of a categorical model, ensured persistence of traditional categories of disorder, excessive concern with interdiagnostician agreement, insufficient attention to the issue of construct validity, and excessive preoccupation with clinician acceptance. These problems and certain others are illustrated with an analysis of the nosologic status of the schizophrenia construct. There is a significant danger that the adequacy of DSM-IV will be compromised by continuing difficulties of this sort.
有人认为,《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》(DSM)分类法最新版本的制定格式受到限制,严重损害了产品质量。这些限制包括不恰当地假定分类模型、传统疾病类别持续存在、过度关注诊断医生之间的一致性、对结构效度问题关注不足以及过度关注临床医生的接受度。通过对精神分裂症结构的疾病分类状况进行分析,阐述了这些问题及其他一些问题。存在一种重大风险,即这类持续存在的困难会损害《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版(DSM-IV)的充分性。