Hytönen Maija L, Bäck Leif J J, Malmivaara Antti V, Roine Risto P
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Finland.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2009 Aug;266(8):1257-66. doi: 10.1007/s00405-009-0914-y. Epub 2009 Feb 3.
Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a relatively new method for the reduction of submucosal tissue. The method has gained increasing popularity in the treatment of snoring, tonsillar hypertrophy, tongue base hypertrophy, and nasal obstruction secondary to non-allergic or allergic rhinitis. We present a systematic literature review of current knowledge on the effectiveness, and complications of nasal radiofrequency thermal ablation (RFA) in the treatment of nasal obstruction. We performed a computerized literature search using several databases to select articles dealing with RFA treatment in the field of otorhinolaryngology. Selected articles were independently appraised by at least two of the authors. Thirty-five articles met the inclusion criteria. Twenty-six articles were reports on uncontrolled patient series. Of the nine included randomized controlled trials only one reported a double-blind comparison. Most of the studies reported an improvement in subjective symptoms after treatment and the number of serious side effects was small. However, the only placebo-controlled trial did not show effectiveness. Nasal-RFA appears to be a safe operative procedure and may reduce inferior turbinate submucosal tissue volume in patients having chronic nasal obstruction and who fail to respond to medical treatment. Based on current knowledge, RFA alters the nasal mucosa only slightly and causes only minor discomfort and risk of side effects for the patient. However, most of the published studies on nasal-RFA are observational and have a relatively short follow-up. Consequently, there is an urgent need for well-planned, double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized trials on nasal-RFA treatment.
射频消融术(RFA)是一种用于减少黏膜下组织的相对较新的方法。该方法在治疗打鼾、扁桃体肥大、舌根肥大以及非过敏性或过敏性鼻炎继发的鼻塞方面越来越受欢迎。我们对鼻腔射频热消融术(RFA)治疗鼻塞的有效性和并发症的现有知识进行了系统的文献综述。我们使用多个数据库进行了计算机化文献检索,以选择耳鼻喉科领域中涉及RFA治疗的文章。入选的文章由至少两位作者独立评估。35篇文章符合纳入标准。26篇文章是关于非对照患者系列的报告。在纳入的9项随机对照试验中,只有1项报告了双盲比较。大多数研究报告治疗后主观症状有所改善,严重副作用的数量较少。然而,唯一的安慰剂对照试验并未显示出有效性。鼻腔RFA似乎是一种安全的手术操作,对于患有慢性鼻塞且药物治疗无效的患者,可能会减少下鼻甲黏膜下组织体积。基于现有知识,RFA对鼻黏膜的改变很小,给患者带来的不适和副作用风险也很小。然而,大多数关于鼻腔RFA的已发表研究都是观察性的,随访时间相对较短。因此,迫切需要针对鼻腔RFA治疗进行精心设计、双盲、安慰剂对照的随机试验。