Krasnov Boris R, Vinarski Maxim V, Korallo-Vinarskaya Natalia P, Mouillot David, Poulin Robert
Mitrani Department of Desert Ecology, Swiss Institute for Dryland Environmental Research, Jacob Blaustein Institutes for Desert Research, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Sede-Boqer Campus, Midreshet Ben-Gurion, Israel.
Oecologia. 2009 May;160(1):175-85. doi: 10.1007/s00442-009-1278-0. Epub 2009 Feb 3.
Within a community, the abundance of any given species depends in large part on a network of direct and indirect, positive and negative interactions with other species, including shared enemies. In communities where experimental manipulations are often impossible (e.g., parasite communities), census data can be used to evaluate the strength or frequency of positive and negative associations among species. In ectoparasite communities, competitive associations can arise because of limited space or food, but facilitative associations can also exist if one species suppresses host immune defenses. In addition, positive associations among parasites could arise merely due to shared preferences for the same host, without any interaction going on. We used census data from 28 regional surveys of gamasid mites parasitic on small mammals throughout the Palaearctic, to assess how the abundance of individual mite species is influenced by the abundance and diversity of other mite species on the same host. After controlling for several confounding variables, the abundance of individual mite species was generally positively correlated with the combined abundances of all other mite species in the community. This trend was confirmed by meta-analysis of the results obtained for separate mite species. In contrast, there were generally no consistent relationships between the abundance of individual mite species and either the species richness or taxonomic diversity of the community in which they occur. These patterns were independent of mite feeding mode. Our results indicate either that synergistic facilitative interactions among mites increase the host's susceptibility to further attacks (e.g., via immunosuppression) and lead to different species all having increased abundance on the same host, or that certain characteristics make some host species preferred habitats for many parasite species.
在一个群落中,任何特定物种的丰富度在很大程度上取决于与其他物种(包括共同的天敌)之间直接和间接、正向和负向相互作用的网络。在那些通常无法进行实验操作的群落(如寄生虫群落)中,普查数据可用于评估物种间正向和负向关联的强度或频率。在外寄生虫群落中,由于空间或食物有限可能会出现竞争关联,但如果一个物种抑制宿主的免疫防御,也可能存在促进关联。此外,寄生虫之间的正向关联可能仅仅是由于对同一宿主有共同偏好,而没有任何相互作用。我们使用了来自古北界各地对寄生在小型哺乳动物身上的革螨进行的28次区域调查的普查数据,以评估单个螨类物种的丰富度如何受到同一宿主上其他螨类物种的丰富度和多样性的影响。在控制了几个混杂变量后,单个螨类物种的丰富度通常与群落中所有其他螨类物种的总丰富度呈正相关。对单独螨类物种所得结果的荟萃分析证实了这一趋势。相比之下,单个螨类物种的丰富度与它们所在群落的物种丰富度或分类多样性之间通常没有一致的关系。这些模式与螨类的取食方式无关。我们的结果表明,要么螨类之间的协同促进相互作用增加了宿主对进一步攻击的易感性(例如通过免疫抑制),导致不同物种在同一宿主上的丰富度都增加,要么某些特征使一些宿主物种成为许多寄生虫物种的首选栖息地。