Berrick Jill Duerr, Choi Young, D'Andrade Amy, Frame Laura
University of California at Berkeley, School of Social Welfare, Berkeley, California 94720-7400, USA.
Child Welfare. 2008;87(3):163-82.
The Adoption and Safe Families Act (ASFA) of 1997 includes provisions to deny reunification services under specified conditions and gives states latitude to develop any number of additional "aggravated circumstances" in which parents need not be offered services. California legislators have developed a relatively large number of conditions enabling agencies to bypass reunification services. Based upon a case record review involving 1,055 parents, this study attempts to identify the proportion of parents eligible for a reunification bypass, the proportion recommended to the courts, and the proportion of parents who were denied reunification services, and examines the characteristics of parents associated with reunification bypass recommendations. Based upon focus groups and interviews with child welfare and judicial personnel in six counties, the study also examines the implementation of reunification bypass provisions. Implications for public policy and practice are provided.
1997年的《收养与安全家庭法》(ASFA)包含在特定条件下拒绝提供家庭团聚服务的条款,并赋予各州自行制定任意数量额外“加重情节”的权力,在此类情节下无需向父母提供服务。加利福尼亚州的立法者制定了相对较多的条件,使得各机构能够绕过家庭团聚服务。基于对1055名父母的案例记录审查,本研究试图确定符合绕过家庭团聚服务资格的父母比例、被推荐给法院的比例以及被拒绝提供家庭团聚服务的父母比例,并考察与绕过家庭团聚服务推荐相关的父母特征。基于对六个县儿童福利和司法人员的焦点小组访谈,本研究还考察了绕过家庭团聚服务条款的实施情况。文中还给出了对公共政策和实践的启示。