• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

以家庭为中心的居家团聚:一项实验研究。

In-home family-focused reunification: an experimental study.

作者信息

Walton E, Fraser M W, Lewis R E, Pecora P J, Walton W K

机构信息

College of Social Work, Ohio State University, Columbus.

出版信息

Child Welfare. 1993 Sep-Oct;72(5):473-87.

PMID:8404251
Abstract

Intensive, in-home family-based services were employed in reunifying families separated by the placement of a child in out-of-home care. After a 90-day service period, 93% of the 57 families randomly assigned to receive the intensive treatment were reunited-compared to 28% of the 53 families in a control group who received routine out-of-home care services. Follow-up data were collected six and 12 months after the end of treatment. Estimates of outcomes suggest that the experimental treatment had a substantial impact on families and that treatment effects endured for upwards of 12 months following cessation of direct intervention services.

摘要

针对因孩子被安置在家庭外照料机构而分离的家庭,采用了强化的、基于家庭的居家服务来使其团聚。在为期90天的服务期后,随机分配接受强化治疗的57个家庭中有93%实现了团聚,而接受常规家庭外照料服务的对照组53个家庭中这一比例为28%。在治疗结束后的6个月和12个月收集了随访数据。结果估计表明,实验性治疗对家庭产生了重大影响,并且在直接干预服务停止后的12个月以上,治疗效果仍然存在。

相似文献

1
In-home family-focused reunification: an experimental study.以家庭为中心的居家团聚:一项实验研究。
Child Welfare. 1993 Sep-Oct;72(5):473-87.
2
Hawaii's healthy start home visiting program: determinants and impact of rapid repeat birth.夏威夷健康开端家访项目:快速再次生育的决定因素及影响
Pediatrics. 2004 Sep;114(3):e317-26. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-0618.
3
Evaluating intensive family preservation programs: a methodological review.评估强化家庭保全项目:方法学综述
Pediatrics. 1996 Apr;97(4):535-42.
4
Evaluation of an intensive in-home family treatment program to prevent out-of-home placement.评估一项强化家庭内治疗计划以预防儿童被安置到家庭外环境。
J Evid Based Soc Work. 2010 May;7(3):200-18. doi: 10.1080/15433710902911063.
5
Enhancing investigative decisions in child welfare: an exploratory use of intensive family preservation services.加强儿童福利调查决策:强化家庭保护服务的探索性应用。
Child Welfare. 1997 May-Jun;76(3):447-61.
6
[Effectiveness of in-home family-focused interventions].[家庭聚焦式居家干预的效果]
Prax Kinderpsychol Kinderpsychiatr. 2008;57(2):130-46. doi: 10.13109/prkk.2008.57.2.130.
7
A national study of male involvement among families in contact with the child welfare system.一项关于与儿童福利系统有接触的家庭中男性参与情况的全国性研究。
Child Maltreat. 2009 Aug;14(3):255-62. doi: 10.1177/1077559508326288. Epub 2008 Nov 4.
8
Intensive intervention for maltreated infants and toddlers in foster care.对寄养中受虐待婴幼儿的强化干预。
Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am. 1998 Apr;7(2):357-71.
9
Effectively addressing mental health issues in permanency-focused child welfare practice.在以永久性为重点的儿童福利实践中有效解决心理健康问题。
Child Welfare. 2007 Sep-Oct;86(5):93-112.
10
Reasonable efforts? Implementation of the reunification bypass provision of ASFA.合理努力?《领养与安全家庭法案》中统一绕过条款的实施。
Child Welfare. 2008;87(3):163-82.

引用本文的文献

1
Identifying Effective Components of Child Maltreatment Interventions: A Meta-analysis.识别儿童虐待干预措施的有效成分:一项荟萃分析。
Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2018 Jun;21(2):171-202. doi: 10.1007/s10567-017-0250-5.
2
Lay health workers in primary and community health care for maternal and child health and the management of infectious diseases.基层和社区卫生保健中负责母婴健康及传染病管理的非专业卫生工作者。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Mar 17;2010(3):CD004015. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004015.pub3.