两种用于诊室环境的自动血压计的比较。
Comparison of two automated sphygmomanometers for use in the office setting.
作者信息
Myers Martin G, Valdivieso Miguel, Kiss Alexander, Tobe Sheldon W
机构信息
Division of Cardiology, Schulich Heart Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
出版信息
Blood Press Monit. 2009 Feb;14(1):45-7. doi: 10.1097/MBP.0b013e32831e314f.
OBJECTIVE
To compare readings obtained using two automated blood pressure (BP) recording devices, BpTRU and Omron 907, in a clinical setting.
METHODS
Two series of 50 patients attending a hypertension unit for 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring had BP recorded either every 1 or every 2 min using BpTRU and Omron 907 devices with the order of the measurements being randomized.
RESULTS
No significant differences for systolic BP between the mean readings taken using the BpTRU or Omron 907 recorders at either 1 or 2 min were observed. Diastolic BP readings were similar using the 1-min interval setting but were 5.0 mmHg lower for the Omron 907 (P<0.001) when readings were taken at 2-min intervals.
CONCLUSION
BP measurements can be made in the clinical setting using either the BpTRU or Omron 907 automated sphygmomanometers.
目的
在临床环境中比较使用两种自动血压记录设备BpTRU和欧姆龙907所获得的读数。
方法
两组各50名前往高血压科进行24小时动态血压监测的患者，使用BpTRU和欧姆龙907设备，以随机顺序每1分钟或每2分钟记录一次血压。
结果
在1分钟或2分钟时，使用BpTRU或欧姆龙907记录仪所测得的平均收缩压读数之间未观察到显著差异。在1分钟间隔设置下，舒张压读数相似，但在2分钟间隔测量时，欧姆龙907的舒张压读数低5.0 mmHg（P<0.001）。
结论
在临床环境中，可以使用BpTRU或欧姆龙907自动血压计进行血压测量。
Zotero 插件