• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Transplant tourism to China: the impact on domestic patient-care decisions.中国的器官移植旅游:对国内患者就医决策的影响。
Clin Transplant. 2009 Nov-Dec;23(6):831-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0012.2008.00949.x. Epub 2009 Jan 10.
2
Transplant tourism.器官移植旅游。
Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 2010 Apr;15(2):245-8. doi: 10.1097/mot.0b013e328337353e.
3
Transplant tourism in China: a tale of two transplants.中国的器官移植旅游:两次移植的故事。
Am J Bioeth. 2010 Feb;10(2):3-11. doi: 10.1080/15265160903558781.
4
Transplant Medicine in China: Need for Transparency and International Scrutiny Remains.中国的移植医学:仍需透明度和国际监督。
Am J Transplant. 2016 Nov;16(11):3115-3120. doi: 10.1111/ajt.14014. Epub 2016 Sep 19.
5
Commentary: Rights, professional obligations, and moral disapproval.
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2011 Jan;20(1):144-7; discussion 143. doi: 10.1017/S0963180110000721.
6
The case of the criminal liver.
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2011 Jan;20(1):143. doi: 10.1017/S096318011000071X.
7
Transplant Ethics.移植伦理学
Exp Clin Transplant. 2016 Nov;14(Suppl 3):32-36.
8
Commentary: Problems of patient and professional responsibilities.
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2011 Jan;20(1):147-9; discussion 143. doi: 10.1017/S0963180110000733.
9
Moral complexity and the delusion of moral purity.道德复杂性与道德纯洁的错觉。
Am J Bioeth. 2010 Feb;10(2):W1-3. doi: 10.1080/15265160903558807.
10
New Zealand transplant patients and organ transplantation in China: some ethical considerations.新西兰的移植患者与中国的器官移植:一些伦理考量
N Z Med J. 2018 Jul 13;131(1478):55-61.

引用本文的文献

1
Deceased donor kidney transplant policies in Asia - implications on practice and recommendations for the future.亚洲已故捐赠者肾脏移植政策——对实践的影响及未来建议
Lancet Reg Health Southeast Asia. 2023 Nov 9;21:100312. doi: 10.1016/j.lansea.2023.100312. eCollection 2024 Feb.
2
Institutional standard framework and experience of living donor liver transplantation for overseas non-Korean patients at Asan Medical Center.峨山医院为海外非韩国患者进行活体肝移植的机构标准框架与经验
Korean J Transplant. 2021 Jun 30;35(2):93-99. doi: 10.4285/kjt.20.0045. Epub 2021 Apr 7.
3
Key issues in transplant tourism.移植旅游中的关键问题。
World J Transplant. 2012 Feb 24;2(1):9-18. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v2.i1.9.

本文引用的文献

1
Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects.《赫尔辛基宣言》。涉及人类受试者的医学研究伦理原则。
J Indian Med Assoc. 2009 Jun;107(6):403-5.
2
The Declaration of Istanbul on Organ Trafficking and Transplant Tourism.《关于器官贩卖和移植旅游的伊斯坦布尔宣言》
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2008 Sep;3(5):1227-31. doi: 10.2215/CJN.03320708. Epub 2008 Aug 13.
3
Medical tourism: the trend toward outsourcing medical procedures to foreign countries.医疗旅游:将医疗程序外包到国外的趋势。
J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2008 Spring;28(2):99-102. doi: 10.1002/chp.165.
4
Transplants in Foreign Countries Among Patients Removed from the US Transplant Waiting List.
Am J Transplant. 2008 Apr;8(4 Pt 2):988-96. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2008.02176.x.
5
A socioeconomic survey of kidney vendors in Pakistan.巴基斯坦肾脏卖主的社会经济调查。
Transpl Int. 2007 Nov;20(11):934-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-2277.2007.00529.x. Epub 2007 Jul 20.
6
China introduces new rules to deter human organ trade.中国出台新规定以遏制人体器官交易。
Lancet. 2007 Jun 9;369(9577):1917-8. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60897-6.
7
Perceived transparency and fairness of the organ allocation system and willingness to donate organs: a national study.器官分配系统的感知透明度与公平性以及器官捐赠意愿:一项全国性研究。
Am J Transplant. 2007 Jul;7(7):1778-87. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2007.01848.x. Epub 2007 May 25.
8
Checklist: passport, plane ticket, organ transplant.
Am J Transplant. 2007 Jul;7(7):1698-701. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2007.01847.x. Epub 2007 May 19.
9
Guidelines for the psychosocial evaluation of living unrelated kidney donors in the United States.美国活体非亲属肾供体心理社会评估指南
Am J Transplant. 2007 May;7(5):1047-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2007.01751.x. Epub 2007 Mar 12.
10
Sampling bias in an international internet survey of diversion programs in the criminal justice system.一项关于刑事司法系统中分流计划的国际互联网调查中的抽样偏差。
Eval Health Prof. 2007 Mar;30(1):35-46. doi: 10.1177/0163278706297344.

中国的器官移植旅游:对国内患者就医决策的影响。

Transplant tourism to China: the impact on domestic patient-care decisions.

机构信息

Gastroenterology Heath Outcomes Policy and Economics Research Program, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143-0538, USA.

出版信息

Clin Transplant. 2009 Nov-Dec;23(6):831-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0012.2008.00949.x. Epub 2009 Jan 10.

DOI:10.1111/j.1399-0012.2008.00949.x
PMID:19191815
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2866030/
Abstract

UNLABELLED

Organ procurement in China has been criticized because of its reliance on executed prisoners as donors. We aimed to assess the influence of perceptions about organ procurement practices in China on domestic patient-care decisions.

METHODS

An anonymous internet administered case-based questionnaire was used to survey a sample of healthcare professionals with affiliations to hepatology and transplantation professional societies.

RESULTS

Of 674 completed surveys, the vast majority (93%) of the respondents were physicians, surgeons or allied transplant professionals actively caring for liver transplant patients and 81% practiced in the US. A strong majority believed procurement practices were ethically sound in the US and Europe (87% and 73%) but fare fewer believed that procurement practices were ethically sound in China (4%, p < 0.001). In case-based questions, lack of confidence in the ethical standards of organ procurement in China predicted patient-care decisions. The majority would provide post-transplantation care for patients who underwent liver transplantation at another domestic center, in a foreign country and in China (90%, 78%, and 63%, respectively, p < 0.001) yet respondents who suspected unethical procurement practices in China were more reluctant to do so (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Transplant professionals expressed concern about organ procurement practices in China which influenced their patient-care decision-making.

摘要

未标注

中国的器官获取一直饱受争议,因为其依赖于死刑犯作为供体。我们旨在评估中国器官获取实践相关认知对国内患者治疗决策的影响。

方法

我们采用匿名网络管理的案例式问卷,对与肝脏病学和移植专业学会有关联的医疗保健专业人员进行了抽样调查。

结果

在 674 份完成的调查中,绝大多数(93%)的应答者是积极照顾肝移植患者的内科医师、外科医师或相关移植专业人员,81%的人在美国行医。绝大多数人认为美国和欧洲的器官获取实践在伦理上是合理的(分别为 87%和 73%),但认为中国的器官获取实践在伦理上是合理的人数较少(4%,p < 0.001)。在案例问题中,对中国器官获取伦理标准缺乏信心预测了患者的治疗决策。大多数人会为在另一个国内中心、在国外和在中国进行肝移植的患者提供移植后护理(分别为 90%、78%和 63%,p < 0.001),但怀疑中国存在不道德的器官获取做法的应答者更不愿意这样做(p < 0.001)。

结论

移植专业人员对中国的器官获取实践表示担忧,这影响了他们的患者治疗决策。