Battelle Memorial Institute, Columbus, OH 43201, USA.
J Appl Microbiol. 2009 Mar;106(3):738-47. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2008.04019.x. Epub 2009 Jan 15.
To determine the efficiency of various ultrafiltration cartridges (UFC) in concentrating test micro-organisms from drinking water.
Replicate drinking water samples from three potable water supplies were dosed with Bacillus anthracis Sterne, Francisella tularensis LVS, Yersinia pestis CO92, bacteriophages MS2 and phi-X174, and Cryptosporidium parvum. The test micro-organisms were dosed together in 100 l of water, which was then recirculated through one of five different UFC until the retentate volume was reduced to c. 500 ml. The micro-organisms were assayed before and after ultrafiltration concentration and per cent recoveries were calculated. There were nine statistically significant differences among pairs of filters out of a possible 180 different combinations of UFC, test micro-organisms, and water types.
No filter consistently performed better or worse than the others for each test micro-organism in all water samples tested.
This study provides performance data on the ability of several different UFC to concentrate a panel of test micro-organisms from three sources of potable water. Water utilities and first responders may use these data when selecting UFC for use in emergency response protocols. This study also provides additional data as to the efficacy of ultrafiltration for recovering bacteria, virus-like particles, and protozoan oocysts from water samples.
确定各种超滤(UFC)在浓缩饮用水中测试微生物方面的效率。
用炭疽杆菌 Sterne、土拉弗朗西斯菌 LVS、鼠疫耶尔森菌 CO92、噬菌体 MS2 和 phi-X174 以及小隐孢子虫对来自三个饮用水供应的重复饮用水样本进行处理。将测试微生物一起投加到 100 升水中,然后通过五种不同的 UFC 之一进行再循环,直到浓缩物体积减少到约 500 毫升。在超滤浓缩前后对微生物进行检测,并计算回收率。在 180 种可能的 UFC、测试微生物和水样的不同组合中,有 9 对过滤器之间存在统计学上的显著差异。
在所有测试水样中,没有一种过滤器对每种测试微生物的性能始终优于或劣于其他过滤器。
本研究提供了几种不同 UFC 浓缩来自三种饮用水源的一组测试微生物的能力的性能数据。水公用事业和第一响应者可能会在选择 UFC 用于应急响应协议时使用这些数据。本研究还提供了超滤从水样中回收细菌、病毒样颗粒和原生动物卵囊的功效的其他数据。