Isenring E, Colombo M, Cross G, Kellett E, Swaney L
Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
J Hum Nutr Diet. 2009 Feb;22(1):50-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-277X.2008.00919.x.
Bioelectrical impedance spectroscopy (BIS) may be more accurate in determining total body water (TBW) than bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA). The present study compared the agreement between three TBW prediction equations developed using BIA and BIS-derived TBW in oncology outpatients.
A cross-sectional, observational study was conducted in 37 outpatients receiving radiotherapy (27 males/10 females, aged 68.3 +/- 10.2 years). TBW was estimated by BIS (TBW(BIS)) and three BIA TBW prediction equations (TBW(ca-u): underweight cancer patients; TBW(ca-n): normal-weight cancer patients; and TBW(rad): patients receiving radiotherapy). Bland-Altman analyses determined agreement between methods. BIS-derived TBW using new resistivity constants was calculated.
The mean +/- SD of TBW estimated by BIS was 39.8 +/- 8.3 L, which was significantly different from the prediction equations; TBW(rad) 35.1 +/- 7.9 L, TBW(ca-u) 33.1 +/- 7.5 L and TBW(ca-n) 32.3 +/- 7.3 L, (P < 0.001). Using new resistivity constants, TBW was 36.2 +/- 8.1 L but this still differed from the equations (P < 0.001). Bias between TBW(BIS) and that predicted by the equations was in the range 4.7-7.4 L or 1.1-3.9 L using new resistivity constants.
TBW estimated by BIS cannot be directly compared with oncology-specific BIA equations, suggesting that BIS cannot be used at the group level in outpatients receiving radiotherapy. There was a reduced bias with BIS using new resistivity constants; however, further research should determine any advantage of BIS over BIA in this population.
与生物电阻抗分析(BIA)相比,生物电阻抗光谱法(BIS)在测定总体水(TBW)方面可能更准确。本研究比较了在肿瘤门诊患者中使用BIA和BIS得出的TBW所建立的三个TBW预测方程之间的一致性。
对37名接受放疗的门诊患者(27名男性/10名女性,年龄68.3±10.2岁)进行了一项横断面观察性研究。通过BIS(TBW(BIS))和三个BIA TBW预测方程(TBW(ca-u):体重过轻的癌症患者;TBW(ca-n):体重正常的癌症患者;以及TBW(rad):接受放疗的患者)估算TBW。Bland-Altman分析确定了各方法之间的一致性。计算了使用新电阻率常数得出的BIS衍生TBW。
BIS估算的TBW的平均值±标准差为39.8±8.3L,与预测方程有显著差异;TBW(rad)为35.1±7.9L,TBW(ca-u)为33.1±7.5L,TBW(ca-n)为32.3±7.3L,(P<0.001)。使用新电阻率常数时,TBW为36.2±8.1L,但这仍与方程不同(P<0.001)。TBW(BIS)与方程预测值之间的偏差范围为4.7-7.4L,使用新电阻率常数时为1.1-3.9L。
BIS估算的TBW不能直接与肿瘤学专用的BIA方程进行比较,这表明BIS不能在接受放疗的门诊患者群体层面使用。使用新电阻率常数时BIS的偏差有所减小;然而,进一步的研究应确定BIS在此人群中相对于BIA的任何优势。