Isenring E, Bauer J, Capra S, Davies P S W
The Wesley Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia.
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2004 Jan;58(1):46-51. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601744.
To investigate the accuracy of total body water (TBW) predicted by foot-to-foot bioelectrical impedance compared with a deuterium oxide dilution technique in oncology outpatients receiving radiotherapy.
Cross-sectional design.
Two private Australian radiation oncology facilities.
In all, 27 subjects (23 males; four females); mean age 62 (+/-15) y; mean BMI 26.2 kg/m2 (+/- 3.6).
TBW was measured using a deuterium oxide dilution technique and predicted using foot-to-foot bioelectrical impedance (Tanita Inc., Tokyo, Japan, Models TBF 410 and 300GS).
The mean (s.d.) values for predicted and measured TBW was 41.5 (6.7) and 39.7 (8.7) l, respectively, indicating a mean bias to overestimation by the foot-to-foot impedance of 1.8 l. However, a significant negative correlation between the mean of the measurements of TBW and their difference (r=-0.40; P=0.04) indicates a progressive underestimation of TBW by foot-to-foot impedance as the water content of the body increases. The analysis of 95% limits of agreement (+/-2 s.d.) showed that for most individuals the TBW predicted by foot-to-foot impedance can vary as much as 12 l above or 8.6 l below the actual TBW measured by a deuterium oxide dilution technique.
There is good agreement between foot-to-foot bioelectrical impedance with a gold standard technique at the group level. However, the significant correlation between the difference of predicted and measured TBW, and the wide limits of agreement between the two methods, indicates that the use of foot-to-foot impedance in assessing TBW may lead to unacceptable error in individuals.
研究在接受放疗的肿瘤门诊患者中,与氧化氘稀释技术相比,双足生物电阻抗法预测总体水(TBW)的准确性。
横断面设计。
澳大利亚两家私立放射肿瘤学机构。
共27名受试者(23名男性;4名女性);平均年龄62(±15)岁;平均体重指数26.2 kg/m²(±3.6)。
采用氧化氘稀释技术测量TBW,并使用双足生物电阻抗法(日本东京百利达公司,型号TBF 410和300GS)进行预测。
预测和测量的TBW的平均(标准差)值分别为41.5(6.7)升和39.7(8.7)升,表明双足阻抗法平均高估了1.8升。然而,TBW测量值的均值与其差值之间存在显著负相关(r = -0.40;P = 0.04),这表明随着身体含水量增加,双足阻抗法对TBW的估计逐渐偏低。对95%一致性界限(±2标准差)的分析表明,对于大多数个体,双足阻抗法预测的TBW可能比氧化氘稀释技术测量的实际TBW高出多达12升或低8.6升。
在群体水平上,双足生物电阻抗法与金标准技术之间具有良好的一致性。然而,预测和测量的TBW差值之间的显著相关性以及两种方法之间较宽的一致性界限表明,使用双足阻抗法评估TBW可能会在个体中导致不可接受的误差。