Suppr超能文献

大块充填修复性复合树脂与牙本质的微拉伸粘结强度

Microtensile bond strength of bulk-fill restorative composites to dentin.

作者信息

Mandava Jyothi, Vegesna Divya-Prasanna, Ravi Ravichandra, Boddeda Mohan-Rao, Uppalapati Lakshman-Varma, Ghazanfaruddin M D

机构信息

Professor and Head of the Department, Department of Conservative dentistry, GITAM Dental college and hospital, Visakhapatnam.

Post Graduate student, Department of Conservative dentistry, GITAM Dental college and hospital, Visakhapatnam.

出版信息

J Clin Exp Dent. 2017 Aug 1;9(8):e1023-e1028. doi: 10.4317/jced.53965. eCollection 2017 Aug.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

To facilitate the easier placement of direct resin composite in deeper cavities, bulk fill composites have been introduced. The Mechanical stability of fillings in stress bearing areas restored with bulk-fill resin composites is still open to question, since long term clinical studies are not available so far. Thus, the objective of the study was to evaluate and compare the microtensile bond strength of three bulk-fill restorative composites with a nanohybrid composite.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Class I cavities were prepared on sixty extracted mandibular molars. Teeth were divided into 4 groups (n= 15 each) and in group I, the prepared cavities were restored with nanohybrid (Filtek Z250 XT) restorative composite in an incremental manner. In group II, III and IV, the bulk-fill composites (Filtek, Tetric EvoCeram, X-tra fil bulk-fill restoratives) were placed as a 4 mm single increment and light cured. The restored teeth were subjected to thermocycling and bond strength testing was done using instron testing machine. The mode of failure was assessed by scanning electron microscope (SEM). The bond strength values obtained in megapascals (MPa) were subjected to statistical analysis, using SPSS/PC version 20 software.One-way ANOVA was used for groupwise comparison of the bond strength. Tukey's Post Hoc test was used for pairwise comparisons among the groups.

RESULTS

The highest mean bond strength was achieved with Filtek bulk-fill restorative showing statistically significant difference with Tetric EvoCeram bulk-fill (< 0.003) and X-tra fil bulk-fill (<0.001) composites. Adhesive failures are mostly observed with X-tra fil bulk fill composites, whereas mixed failures are more common with other bulk fill composites.

CONCLUSIONS

Bulk-fill composites exhibited adequate bond strength to dentin and can be considered as restorative material of choice in posterior stress bearing areas. Bond strength, Bulk-fill restoratives, Configuration factor, Polymerization shrinkage.

摘要

背景

为便于在较深窝洞中更轻松地放置直接树脂复合材料,推出了大块充填复合材料。由于目前尚无长期临床研究,因此用大块充填树脂复合材料修复的应力承载区域充填物的机械稳定性仍存在疑问。因此,本研究的目的是评估和比较三种大块充填修复复合材料与一种纳米混合复合材料的微拉伸粘结强度。

材料与方法

在60颗拔除的下颌磨牙上制备I类洞。将牙齿分为4组(每组n = 15),在第I组中,用纳米混合(Filtek Z250 XT)修复复合材料逐层修复制备好的窝洞。在第II、III和IV组中,将大块充填复合材料(Filtek、Tetric EvoCeram、X-tra fil大块充填修复材料)以4 mm的单次增量放置并光固化。对修复后的牙齿进行热循环处理,并使用英斯特朗试验机进行粘结强度测试。通过扫描电子显微镜(SEM)评估失效模式。以兆帕(MPa)为单位获得的粘结强度值使用SPSS/PC 20版软件进行统计分析。单向方差分析用于对粘结强度进行组间比较。Tukey事后检验用于组间的两两比较。

结果

Filtek大块充填修复材料的平均粘结强度最高,与Tetric EvoCeram大块充填材料(<0.003)和X-tra fil大块充填材料(<0.001)复合材料相比有统计学显著差异。X-tra fil大块充填复合材料大多观察到粘结失败,而其他大块充填复合材料则更常见混合失败。

结论

大块充填复合材料对牙本质表现出足够的粘结强度,可被视为后牙应力承载区域的首选修复材料。粘结强度、大块充填修复材料、形态因子、聚合收缩。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a59/5601103/53bbdfd98479/jced-9-e1023-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验