Cabezas Carmen, Martin Carlos, Granollers Silvia, Morera Concepció, Ballve Josep Lluis, Zarza Elvira, Blade Jordi, Borras Margarida, Serra Antoni, Puente Diana
Departament de Salut, Generalitat de Catalunya, Institut d'Investigació en Assistència Primària Jordi Gol (IDIAP Jordi Gol), Barcelona, Spain.
BMC Public Health. 2009 Feb 4;9:48. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-9-48.
There is a considerable body of evidence on the effectiveness of specific interventions in individuals who wish to quit smoking. However, there are no large-scale studies testing the whole range of interventions currently recommended for helping people to give up smoking; specifically those interventions that include motivational interviews for individuals who are not interested in quitting smoking in the immediate to short term. Furthermore, many of the published studies were undertaken in specialized units or by a small group of motivated primary care centres. The objective of the study is to evaluate the effectiveness of a stepped smoking cessation intervention based on a trans-theoretical model of change, applied to an extensive group of Primary Care Centres (PCC).
METHODS/DESIGN: Cluster randomised clinical trial. Unit of randomization: basic unit of care consisting of a family physician and a nurse, both of whom care for the same population (aprox. 2000 people). Intention to treat analysis.
Smokers (n = 3024) aged 14 to 75 years consulting for any reason to PCC and who provided written informed consent to participate in the trial.
6-month implementation of recommendations of a Clinical Practice Guideline which includes brief motivational interviews for smokers at the precontemplation - contemplation stage, brief intervention for smokers in preparation-action who do not want help, intensive intervention with pharmacotherapy for smokers in preparation-action who want help, and reinforcing intervention in the maintenance stage.
usual care.
Self-reported abstinence confirmed by exhaled air carbon monoxide concentration of <or= 10 parts per million. Points of assessment: end of intervention period and 1 and 2 years post-intervention; continuous abstinence rate for 1 year; change in smoking cessation stage; health status measured by SF-36.
The application of a stepped intervention based on the stages of a change model is possible under real and diverse clinical practice conditions, and improves the smoking cessation success rate in smokers, besides of their intention or not to give up smoking at baseline.
有大量证据表明特定干预措施对希望戒烟的个体有效。然而,目前尚无大规模研究对当前推荐的一系列帮助人们戒烟的干预措施进行全面测试;特别是那些针对短期内无意戒烟者的干预措施,其中包括动机访谈。此外,许多已发表的研究是在专门单位或由少数积极主动的基层医疗中心开展的。本研究的目的是评估基于跨理论转变模型的阶梯式戒烟干预措施在广泛的基层医疗中心(PCC)中的有效性。
方法/设计:整群随机临床试验。随机分组单位:由一名家庭医生和一名护士组成的基本护理单元,他们共同为同一人群(约2000人)提供护理。采用意向性分析。
年龄在14至75岁之间、因任何原因到基层医疗中心就诊且提供书面知情同意书参与试验的吸烟者(n = 3024)。
实施一项临床实践指南的建议,为期6个月,其中包括对处于前意向 - 意向阶段的吸烟者进行简短的动机访谈,对处于准备 - 行动阶段但不希望获得帮助的吸烟者进行简短干预,对处于准备 - 行动阶段且希望获得帮助的吸烟者进行强化药物治疗干预,以及在维持阶段进行强化干预。
常规护理。
通过呼出气体一氧化碳浓度≤百万分之10来确认的自我报告戒烟情况。评估时间点:干预期结束时、干预后1年和2年;1年持续戒烟率;戒烟阶段变化;采用SF - 36量表测量的健康状况。
在真实多样的临床实践条件下,基于转变模型各阶段的阶梯式干预措施是可行的,并且除了基线时吸烟者是否有戒烟意愿外,还能提高吸烟者的戒烟成功率。