Suppr超能文献

[基层医疗诊所的烟草解毒:一年随访中医疗咨询、最小干预和尼古丁替代疗法的疗效]

[Tobacco detoxication at a primary care clinic: efficacy of medical counseling, minimal intervention and nicotine replacement therapy at the one-year follow-up].

作者信息

Torrecilla García M, Barrueco Ferrero M, Maderuelo Fernández J, Jiménez Ruiz C, Plaza Martín M, Hernández Mezquita M

机构信息

Centro de Salud San Juan (Salamanca).

出版信息

Aten Primaria. 2001 May 31;27(9):629-36. doi: 10.1016/s0212-6567(01)78871-3.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The main objective was to compare the efficacy of one-off tobacco counselling and of the systematic minimum intervention on making people give up smoking. A secondary aim was to evaluate the efficacy of nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) in the context of a primary care consultation.

DESIGN

Controlled and randomised clinical trial.

SETTING

Primary care.

PARTICIPANTS

Smokers who over 12 months attended a primary care clinic at an urban health centre (304 patients).

INTERVENTIONS

Two kinds of intervention were conducted at random on patients with low nicotine dependence (one-off medical counselling and counselling integrated into what is known as the minimal intervention, but conducted systematically). NRT was administered through nicotine patches (11% nicotine) to patients with moderate-to-high nicotine dependence.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Short-term cessation a year after the minimal intervention was 39% (29.4-49.3%), and maintained cessation 30.9% (29.4-49.3%), as against 11% (5.6-18.8%) short-term cessation in the group that received one-off counselling (p < 0.0001). Short-term tobacco cessation in the NRT group was 35.3% (24.1-47.8%), and maintained cessation 30.8%.

CONCLUSIONS

Primary care is a suitable context for an intervention against tobacco dependency, through the use of any of the established interventions: one-off medical counselling, systematic minimal intervention, or specialist drug treatment through NRT. Therefore, these kinds of intervention must form part of PC clinics' daily activity.

摘要

目的

主要目的是比较一次性烟草咨询与系统性最小干预在帮助人们戒烟方面的效果。次要目的是评估在初级保健咨询背景下尼古丁替代疗法(NRT)的效果。

设计

对照随机临床试验。

地点

初级保健机构。

参与者

在城市健康中心的初级保健诊所就诊超过12个月的吸烟者(304名患者)。

干预措施

对低尼古丁依赖患者随机进行两种干预(一次性医学咨询和融入所谓最小干预但系统实施的咨询)。对中高尼古丁依赖患者通过尼古丁贴片(含11%尼古丁)给予NRT。

测量指标及主要结果

最小干预一年后的短期戒烟率为39%(29.4 - 49.3%),持续戒烟率为30.9%(29.4 - 49.3%),而接受一次性咨询的组短期戒烟率为11%(5.6 - 18.8%)(p < 0.0001)。NRT组的短期戒烟率为35.3%(24.1 - 47.8%),持续戒烟率为30.8%。

结论

初级保健是通过使用任何既定干预措施(一次性医学咨询、系统性最小干预或通过NRT进行专科药物治疗)来干预烟草依赖的合适环境。因此,这类干预必须成为初级保健诊所日常工作的一部分。

相似文献

4
Nicotine receptor partial agonists for smoking cessation.用于戒烟的尼古丁受体部分激动剂。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Apr 18(4):CD006103. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006103.pub6.
7
Nicotine receptor partial agonists for smoking cessation.用于戒烟的尼古丁受体部分激动剂。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 May 9;2016(5):CD006103. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006103.pub7.
9
Interventions to reduce harm from continued tobacco use.减少持续吸烟危害的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 13;10(10):CD005231. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005231.pub3.

引用本文的文献

3
Physician advice for smoking cessation.医生关于戒烟的建议。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 May 31;2013(5):CD000165. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000165.pub4.
4
[Smoking intervention in patients with cardiovascular diseases].[心血管疾病患者的吸烟干预]
Aten Primaria. 2013 Feb;45(2):115-20. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2011.12.006. Epub 2012 Mar 10.

本文引用的文献

2
[Minimal intervention in smoking in Spain].
Arch Bronconeumol. 2000 Mar;36(3):124-8. doi: 10.1016/s0300-2896(15)30196-4.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验