St. Josef-Hospital, Cloppenburg, Germany.
Int J Clin Pract. 2009 Feb;63(2):217-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2008.01977.x.
To demonstrate the benefit of the combination amlodipine/valsartan 5/160 mg over amlodipine 10 mg, in producing a lower incidence of peripheral oedema for a comparable mean sitting systolic blood pressure (MSSBP) reduction.
After a 4-week amlodipine 5 mg run-in phase, inadequately controlled hypertension patients (aged > or = 55 years, MSSBP > or = 130 and < or = 160 mmHg) were randomised to receive amlodipine/valsartan 5/160 mg or amlodipine 10 mg for 8 weeks, followed by amlodipine/valsartan 5/160 mg for 4 weeks for all patients. Primary variables were MSSBP change from baseline to week 8 and incidence of peripheral oedema reported as an AE. Resolution of peripheral oedema was assessed 4 weeks after switching patients from amlodipine 10 mg to amlodipine/ valsartan 5/160 mg.
At week 8, MSSBP showed greater reduction with amlodipine/valsartan 5/160 mg than amlodipine 10 mg (least square mean: -8.01 vs.-5.95 mmHg, p < 0.001 for non-inferiority and p = 0.002 for superiority). Systolic control, overall BP control and systolic response rate at week 8 were significantly higher with combination than amlodipine 10 mg (34 vs. 26%; 57 vs. 50%; 36.57 vs. 27.77%, respectively). Incidence of peripheral oedema was significantly lower with the combination than amlodipine 10 mg (6.6 vs. 31.1%, p < 0.001). Peripheral oedema resolved in 56% patients who switched from amlodipine 10 mg to the combination, without the loss of effect on BP reduction.
In non-responders to amlodipine 5 mg, treatment with amlodipine/valsartan 5/160 mg induced significantly less peripheral oedema than amlodipine 10 mg for similar BP reduction. Peripheral oedema resolved in > 50% patients switching from amlodipine 10 mg to the combination.
证明氨氯地平/缬沙坦 5/160mg 联合治疗较氨氯地平 10mg 能更显著降低外周水肿的发生率,同时使平均坐位收缩压(MSSBP)的下降相当。
在 4 周氨氯地平 5mg 导入期后,血压控制不佳的高血压患者(年龄>55 岁,MSSBP≥130mmHg 且<160mmHg)随机分为两组,分别接受氨氯地平/缬沙坦 5/160mg 或氨氯地平 10mg 治疗 8 周,随后所有患者再换用氨氯地平/缬沙坦 5/160mg 治疗 4 周。主要变量为从基线到第 8 周 MSSBP 的变化以及外周水肿的发生率(作为不良事件报告)。患者从氨氯地平 10mg 换用氨氯地平/缬沙坦 5/160mg 4 周后评估外周水肿的缓解情况。
第 8 周时,氨氯地平/缬沙坦 5/160mg 组 MSSBP 较氨氯地平 10mg 组下降更显著(最小二乘均值:-8.01mmHg 对-5.95mmHg,非劣效性 p<0.001,优效性 p=0.002)。第 8 周时,联合治疗组的收缩压控制、总体血压控制和收缩压反应率均显著高于氨氯地平 10mg 组(34%对 26%;57%对 50%;36.57%对 27.77%)。与氨氯地平 10mg 组相比,联合治疗组外周水肿的发生率显著较低(6.6%对 31.1%,p<0.001)。56%从氨氯地平 10mg 换用联合治疗的患者外周水肿得到缓解,且对降压效果无影响。
在对氨氯地平 5mg 无反应的患者中,与氨氯地平 10mg 相比,氨氯地平/缬沙坦 5/160mg 治疗可显著减少外周水肿的发生,同时使血压降低相当。从氨氯地平 10mg 换用联合治疗的患者中,超过 50%的患者外周水肿得到缓解。