• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在未通过 5 毫克氨氯地平得到充分控制的高血压患者中,氨氯地平/缬沙坦 5/160 毫克的联合使用比使用 10 毫克氨氯地平产生的外周水肿更少。

The combination of amlodipine/valsartan 5/160 mg produces less peripheral oedema than amlodipine 10 mg in hypertensive patients not adequately controlled with amlodipine 5 mg.

机构信息

St. Josef-Hospital, Cloppenburg, Germany.

出版信息

Int J Clin Pract. 2009 Feb;63(2):217-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2008.01977.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1742-1241.2008.01977.x
PMID:19196360
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2705817/
Abstract

AIMS

To demonstrate the benefit of the combination amlodipine/valsartan 5/160 mg over amlodipine 10 mg, in producing a lower incidence of peripheral oedema for a comparable mean sitting systolic blood pressure (MSSBP) reduction.

METHODS

After a 4-week amlodipine 5 mg run-in phase, inadequately controlled hypertension patients (aged > or = 55 years, MSSBP > or = 130 and < or = 160 mmHg) were randomised to receive amlodipine/valsartan 5/160 mg or amlodipine 10 mg for 8 weeks, followed by amlodipine/valsartan 5/160 mg for 4 weeks for all patients. Primary variables were MSSBP change from baseline to week 8 and incidence of peripheral oedema reported as an AE. Resolution of peripheral oedema was assessed 4 weeks after switching patients from amlodipine 10 mg to amlodipine/ valsartan 5/160 mg.

RESULTS

At week 8, MSSBP showed greater reduction with amlodipine/valsartan 5/160 mg than amlodipine 10 mg (least square mean: -8.01 vs.-5.95 mmHg, p < 0.001 for non-inferiority and p = 0.002 for superiority). Systolic control, overall BP control and systolic response rate at week 8 were significantly higher with combination than amlodipine 10 mg (34 vs. 26%; 57 vs. 50%; 36.57 vs. 27.77%, respectively). Incidence of peripheral oedema was significantly lower with the combination than amlodipine 10 mg (6.6 vs. 31.1%, p < 0.001). Peripheral oedema resolved in 56% patients who switched from amlodipine 10 mg to the combination, without the loss of effect on BP reduction.

CONCLUSION

In non-responders to amlodipine 5 mg, treatment with amlodipine/valsartan 5/160 mg induced significantly less peripheral oedema than amlodipine 10 mg for similar BP reduction. Peripheral oedema resolved in > 50% patients switching from amlodipine 10 mg to the combination.

摘要

目的

证明氨氯地平/缬沙坦 5/160mg 联合治疗较氨氯地平 10mg 能更显著降低外周水肿的发生率,同时使平均坐位收缩压(MSSBP)的下降相当。

方法

在 4 周氨氯地平 5mg 导入期后,血压控制不佳的高血压患者(年龄>55 岁,MSSBP≥130mmHg 且<160mmHg)随机分为两组,分别接受氨氯地平/缬沙坦 5/160mg 或氨氯地平 10mg 治疗 8 周,随后所有患者再换用氨氯地平/缬沙坦 5/160mg 治疗 4 周。主要变量为从基线到第 8 周 MSSBP 的变化以及外周水肿的发生率(作为不良事件报告)。患者从氨氯地平 10mg 换用氨氯地平/缬沙坦 5/160mg 4 周后评估外周水肿的缓解情况。

结果

第 8 周时,氨氯地平/缬沙坦 5/160mg 组 MSSBP 较氨氯地平 10mg 组下降更显著(最小二乘均值:-8.01mmHg 对-5.95mmHg,非劣效性 p<0.001,优效性 p=0.002)。第 8 周时,联合治疗组的收缩压控制、总体血压控制和收缩压反应率均显著高于氨氯地平 10mg 组(34%对 26%;57%对 50%;36.57%对 27.77%)。与氨氯地平 10mg 组相比,联合治疗组外周水肿的发生率显著较低(6.6%对 31.1%,p<0.001)。56%从氨氯地平 10mg 换用联合治疗的患者外周水肿得到缓解,且对降压效果无影响。

结论

在对氨氯地平 5mg 无反应的患者中,与氨氯地平 10mg 相比,氨氯地平/缬沙坦 5/160mg 治疗可显著减少外周水肿的发生,同时使血压降低相当。从氨氯地平 10mg 换用联合治疗的患者中,超过 50%的患者外周水肿得到缓解。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8cb5/2705817/73f1769cd383/ijcp0063-0217-f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8cb5/2705817/8e814bb19499/ijcp0063-0217-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8cb5/2705817/08e84bd827a3/ijcp0063-0217-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8cb5/2705817/b8fbfebbd8bf/ijcp0063-0217-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8cb5/2705817/3164b6bda49e/ijcp0063-0217-f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8cb5/2705817/73f1769cd383/ijcp0063-0217-f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8cb5/2705817/8e814bb19499/ijcp0063-0217-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8cb5/2705817/08e84bd827a3/ijcp0063-0217-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8cb5/2705817/b8fbfebbd8bf/ijcp0063-0217-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8cb5/2705817/3164b6bda49e/ijcp0063-0217-f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8cb5/2705817/73f1769cd383/ijcp0063-0217-f5.jpg

相似文献

1
The combination of amlodipine/valsartan 5/160 mg produces less peripheral oedema than amlodipine 10 mg in hypertensive patients not adequately controlled with amlodipine 5 mg.在未通过 5 毫克氨氯地平得到充分控制的高血压患者中,氨氯地平/缬沙坦 5/160 毫克的联合使用比使用 10 毫克氨氯地平产生的外周水肿更少。
Int J Clin Pract. 2009 Feb;63(2):217-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2008.01977.x.
2
Efficacy and safety of a single-pill combination of amlodipine/valsartan in Asian hypertensive patients inadequately controlled with amlodipine monotherapy.在使用氨氯地平单药治疗未能充分控制的亚洲高血压患者中,氨氯地平/缬沙坦单片复方制剂的疗效和安全性。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2010 Jul;26(7):1705-13. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2010.487391.
3
Efficacy and tolerability of amlodipine/valsartan combination therapy in hypertensive patients not adequately controlled on amlodipine monotherapy.氨氯地平/缬沙坦联合治疗对氨氯地平单药治疗控制不佳的高血压患者的疗效和耐受性
Curr Med Res Opin. 2009 Nov;25(11):2655-62. doi: 10.1185/03007990903251193.
4
Tolerability and blood pressure-lowering efficacy of the combination of amlodipine plus valsartan compared with lisinopril plus hydrochlorothiazide in adult patients with stage 2 hypertension.氨氯地平联合缬沙坦与赖诺普利联合氢氯噻嗪治疗成年2级高血压患者的耐受性及降压疗效比较
Clin Ther. 2007 Feb;29(2):279-89. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.02.003.
5
Two multicenter, 8-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group studies evaluating the efficacy and tolerability of amlodipine and valsartan in combination and as monotherapy in adult patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension.两项多中心、为期8周、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、平行组研究,评估氨氯地平和缬沙坦联合用药及单药治疗对轻度至中度原发性高血压成年患者的疗效和耐受性。
Clin Ther. 2007 Apr;29(4):563-80. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.03.018.
6
Long-term tolerability and efficacy of the combination of amlodipine/valsartan in hypertensive patients: a 54-week, open-label extension study.氨氯地平/缬沙坦联合用药在高血压患者中的长期耐受性和疗效:一项为期54周的开放标签扩展研究。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2009 Jan;25(1):187-93. doi: 10.1185/03007990802628046.
7
Efficacy and tolerability of amlodipine/valsartan combination therapy in hypertensive patients not adequately controlled on valsartan monotherapy.氨氯地平/缬沙坦联合治疗对缬沙坦单药治疗控制不佳的高血压患者的疗效和耐受性
Curr Med Res Opin. 2009 Feb;25(2):315-24. doi: 10.1185/03007990802630588.
8
Efficacy and tolerability of combination therapy with valsartan plus hydrochlorothiazide compared with amlodipine monotherapy in hypertensive patients with other cardiovascular risk factors: the VAST study.缬沙坦联合氢氯噻嗪与氨氯地平单药治疗对伴有其他心血管危险因素的高血压患者的疗效及耐受性比较:VAST研究
Clin Ther. 2005 May;27(5):578-87. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2005.05.006.
9
Amlodipine/valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide triple combination therapy in moderate/severe hypertension: Secondary analyses evaluating efficacy and safety.氨氯地平/缬沙坦/氢氯噻嗪三联疗法治疗中重度高血压:评估疗效和安全性的二次分析。
Adv Ther. 2009 Nov;26(11):1012-23. doi: 10.1007/s12325-009-0077-7. Epub 2009 Dec 18.
10
Valsartan addition to amlodipine is more effective than losartan addition in hypertensive patients inadequately controlled by amlodipine.对于仅使用氨氯地平血压控制不佳的高血压患者,加用缬沙坦比加用氯沙坦更有效。
Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2010 Mar 3;6:87-93. doi: 10.2147/vhrm.s9404.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy of single-pill combination in uncontrolled essential hypertension: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.单药复方制剂治疗未控制的原发性高血压的疗效:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Clin Cardiol. 2023 Aug;46(8):886-898. doi: 10.1002/clc.24082. Epub 2023 Jul 11.
2
A Portable Reflective Absorbance Spectrophotometric Smartphone Device for the Rapid and Highly Accurate Determination of Amlodipine in Pharmaceutical Formulation and Human Urine Samples.一种便携式反射吸收光谱光度法智能手机设备,用于快速、高度准确地测定药物制剂和人尿液样品中的氨氯地平。
Anal Sci. 2021 Jul 10;37(7):963-969. doi: 10.2116/analsci.20P349. Epub 2020 Nov 20.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Efficacy and safety of amlodipine/valsartan compared with amlodipine monotherapy in patients with stage 2 hypertension: a randomized, double-blind, multicenter study: the EX-EFFeCTS Study.氨氯地平/缬沙坦与氨氯地平单药治疗对2级高血压患者的疗效和安全性比较:一项随机、双盲、多中心研究:EX-EFFeCTS研究
J Am Soc Hypertens. 2008 Jul-Aug;2(4):294-302. doi: 10.1016/j.jash.2008.01.004. Epub 2008 Jun 2.
2
Combined therapy with a calcium channel blocker and an angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker.钙通道阻滞剂与血管紧张素II 1型受体阻滞剂联合治疗。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2008 Jan;10(1 Suppl 1):27-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-6175.2007.08029.x.
3
Calcium Channel Blockers Co-prescribed with Loop Diuretics: A Potential Marker of Poor Prescribing?
钙通道阻滞剂与袢利尿剂联合使用:一种潜在的不良处方标志物?
Drugs Aging. 2020 Feb;37(2):77-81. doi: 10.1007/s40266-019-00730-4.
4
Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Combination Therapy with Amlodipine and Olmesartan or an Olmesartan/Hydrochlorothiazide Compound for Hypertension: A Prospective, Open-Label, and Multicenter Clinical Trial in China.氨氯地平与奥美沙坦或奥美沙坦/氢氯噻嗪复方联合治疗高血压的临床疗效与安全性:一项中国前瞻性、开放标签、多中心临床试验
Curr Ther Res Clin Exp. 2015 Oct 9;90:99-105. doi: 10.1016/j.curtheres.2015.09.001. eCollection 2019.
5
Application of an LC-MS/MS method for the analysis of amlodipine, valsartan and hydrochlorothiazide in polypill for a bioequivalence study.应用液相色谱-串联质谱法分析复方制剂中氨氯地平、缬沙坦和氢氯噻嗪用于生物等效性研究。
J Pharm Anal. 2017 Oct;7(5):309-316. doi: 10.1016/j.jpha.2017.06.001. Epub 2017 Jun 4.
6
High-dose calcium channel blocker (CCB) monotherapy vs combination therapy of standard-dose CCBs and angiotensin receptor blockers for hypertension: a meta-analysis.高剂量钙通道阻滞剂(CCB)单药治疗与标准剂量CCB和血管紧张素受体阻滞剂联合治疗高血压的Meta分析
J Hum Hypertens. 2017 Feb;31(2):79-88. doi: 10.1038/jhh.2016.46. Epub 2016 Aug 11.
7
Valsartan 160 mg/Amlodipine 5 mg Combination Therapy versus Amlodipine 10 mg in Hypertensive Patients with Inadequate Response to Amlodipine 5 mg Monotherapy.缬沙坦160毫克/氨氯地平5毫克联合治疗与氨氯地平10毫克治疗对氨氯地平5毫克单药治疗反应不佳的高血压患者的疗效比较
Korean Circ J. 2016 Mar;46(2):222-8. doi: 10.4070/kcj.2016.46.2.222. Epub 2016 Mar 21.
8
Meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of adding an angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) to a calcium channel blocker (CCB) following ineffective CCB monotherapy.在钙通道阻滞剂(CCB)单药治疗无效后加用血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARB)的疗效和安全性的荟萃分析。
J Thorac Dis. 2015 Dec;7(12):2243-52. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2015.12.39.
9
Valsartan combination therapy in the management of hypertension - patient perspectives and clinical utility.缬沙坦联合疗法治疗高血压——患者观点与临床效用
Integr Blood Press Control. 2009;2:39-54. doi: 10.2147/ibpc.s4623. Epub 2009 Oct 28.
10
Moderate versus intensive treatment of hypertension with amlodipine/valsartan for patients uncontrolled on angiotensin receptor blocker monotherapy.氨氯地平/缬沙坦治疗血管紧张素受体阻滞剂单药治疗未控制的高血压患者的中强度治疗。
J Hypertens. 2011 Jan;29(1):161-70. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e32834000a7.
Two multicenter, 8-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group studies evaluating the efficacy and tolerability of amlodipine and valsartan in combination and as monotherapy in adult patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension.
两项多中心、为期8周、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、平行组研究,评估氨氯地平和缬沙坦联合用药及单药治疗对轻度至中度原发性高血压成年患者的疗效和耐受性。
Clin Ther. 2007 Apr;29(4):563-80. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.03.018.
4
2007 Guidelines for the Management of Arterial Hypertension: The Task Force for the Management of Arterial Hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC).2007年动脉高血压管理指南:欧洲高血压学会(ESH)和欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)动脉高血压管理特别工作组制定
J Hypertens. 2007 Jun;25(6):1105-87. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e3281fc975a.
5
Outpatient hypertension treatment, treatment intensification, and control in Western Europe and the United States.西欧和美国的门诊高血压治疗、治疗强化及控制情况。
Arch Intern Med. 2007 Jan 22;167(2):141-7. doi: 10.1001/archinte.167.2.141.
6
Recommendations for evaluating compliance and persistence with hypertension therapy using retrospective data.利用回顾性数据评估高血压治疗依从性和持续性的建议。
Hypertension. 2006 Jun;47(6):1039-48. doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000222373.59104.3d. Epub 2006 May 1.
7
Initiation of hypertension treatment with a fixed-dose combination or its monocomponents -- does it really matter?
Int J Clin Pract. 2006 Mar;60(3):265-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1368-5031.2006.00841.x.
8
Pharmacotherapy review: calcium channel blockers.药物治疗综述:钙通道阻滞剂
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2006 Jan;8(1):53-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-6175.2005.04140.x.
9
High-dose monotherapy vs low-dose combination therapy of calcium channel blockers and angiotensin receptor blockers in mild to moderate hypertension.钙通道阻滞剂与血管紧张素受体阻滞剂高剂量单药治疗对比低剂量联合治疗轻至中度高血压
J Hum Hypertens. 2005 Jun;19(6):491-6. doi: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1001843.
10
The role of existing and newer calcium channel blockers in the treatment of hypertension.现有及新型钙通道阻滞剂在高血压治疗中的作用。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2004 Nov;6(11):621-29; quiz 630-1. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-6175.2004.03683.x.