Suppr超能文献

在未通过 5 毫克氨氯地平得到充分控制的高血压患者中,氨氯地平/缬沙坦 5/160 毫克的联合使用比使用 10 毫克氨氯地平产生的外周水肿更少。

The combination of amlodipine/valsartan 5/160 mg produces less peripheral oedema than amlodipine 10 mg in hypertensive patients not adequately controlled with amlodipine 5 mg.

机构信息

St. Josef-Hospital, Cloppenburg, Germany.

出版信息

Int J Clin Pract. 2009 Feb;63(2):217-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2008.01977.x.

Abstract

AIMS

To demonstrate the benefit of the combination amlodipine/valsartan 5/160 mg over amlodipine 10 mg, in producing a lower incidence of peripheral oedema for a comparable mean sitting systolic blood pressure (MSSBP) reduction.

METHODS

After a 4-week amlodipine 5 mg run-in phase, inadequately controlled hypertension patients (aged > or = 55 years, MSSBP > or = 130 and < or = 160 mmHg) were randomised to receive amlodipine/valsartan 5/160 mg or amlodipine 10 mg for 8 weeks, followed by amlodipine/valsartan 5/160 mg for 4 weeks for all patients. Primary variables were MSSBP change from baseline to week 8 and incidence of peripheral oedema reported as an AE. Resolution of peripheral oedema was assessed 4 weeks after switching patients from amlodipine 10 mg to amlodipine/ valsartan 5/160 mg.

RESULTS

At week 8, MSSBP showed greater reduction with amlodipine/valsartan 5/160 mg than amlodipine 10 mg (least square mean: -8.01 vs.-5.95 mmHg, p < 0.001 for non-inferiority and p = 0.002 for superiority). Systolic control, overall BP control and systolic response rate at week 8 were significantly higher with combination than amlodipine 10 mg (34 vs. 26%; 57 vs. 50%; 36.57 vs. 27.77%, respectively). Incidence of peripheral oedema was significantly lower with the combination than amlodipine 10 mg (6.6 vs. 31.1%, p < 0.001). Peripheral oedema resolved in 56% patients who switched from amlodipine 10 mg to the combination, without the loss of effect on BP reduction.

CONCLUSION

In non-responders to amlodipine 5 mg, treatment with amlodipine/valsartan 5/160 mg induced significantly less peripheral oedema than amlodipine 10 mg for similar BP reduction. Peripheral oedema resolved in > 50% patients switching from amlodipine 10 mg to the combination.

摘要

目的

证明氨氯地平/缬沙坦 5/160mg 联合治疗较氨氯地平 10mg 能更显著降低外周水肿的发生率,同时使平均坐位收缩压(MSSBP)的下降相当。

方法

在 4 周氨氯地平 5mg 导入期后,血压控制不佳的高血压患者(年龄>55 岁,MSSBP≥130mmHg 且<160mmHg)随机分为两组,分别接受氨氯地平/缬沙坦 5/160mg 或氨氯地平 10mg 治疗 8 周,随后所有患者再换用氨氯地平/缬沙坦 5/160mg 治疗 4 周。主要变量为从基线到第 8 周 MSSBP 的变化以及外周水肿的发生率(作为不良事件报告)。患者从氨氯地平 10mg 换用氨氯地平/缬沙坦 5/160mg 4 周后评估外周水肿的缓解情况。

结果

第 8 周时,氨氯地平/缬沙坦 5/160mg 组 MSSBP 较氨氯地平 10mg 组下降更显著(最小二乘均值:-8.01mmHg 对-5.95mmHg,非劣效性 p<0.001,优效性 p=0.002)。第 8 周时,联合治疗组的收缩压控制、总体血压控制和收缩压反应率均显著高于氨氯地平 10mg 组(34%对 26%;57%对 50%;36.57%对 27.77%)。与氨氯地平 10mg 组相比,联合治疗组外周水肿的发生率显著较低(6.6%对 31.1%,p<0.001)。56%从氨氯地平 10mg 换用联合治疗的患者外周水肿得到缓解,且对降压效果无影响。

结论

在对氨氯地平 5mg 无反应的患者中,与氨氯地平 10mg 相比,氨氯地平/缬沙坦 5/160mg 治疗可显著减少外周水肿的发生,同时使血压降低相当。从氨氯地平 10mg 换用联合治疗的患者中,超过 50%的患者外周水肿得到缓解。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8cb5/2705817/8e814bb19499/ijcp0063-0217-f1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验