Oyen W J, Claessens R A, van der Meer J W, Corstens F H
Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
J Nucl Med. 1991 Oct;32(10):1854-60.
In 35 patients suspected of an infectious focus, the outcome of scintigraphy with 111In-labeled autologous leukocytes (WBC) and 111In-labeled human nonspecific immunoglobulin G (IgG) was evaluated in a prospective comparative study. Clinical, roentgenologic and microbiologic findings were considered to be proof of the presence of infection or inflammation. In this group of patients with mainly subacute infections, 111In-IgG scintigraphy performed significantly better than 111In-WBC scintigraphy, especially in infections of the locomotor system, but also in various soft-tissue infections. Both techniques showed disappointing results in patients with disseminated yersinia infection and in some patients with tuberculosis. Overall sensitivity and specificity was 74% and 100% for 111In-IgG scintigraphy and 52% and 78% for 111In-WBC scintigraphy, respectively.
在一项前瞻性比较研究中,对35例疑似有感染灶的患者进行了评估,观察用铟-111标记的自体白细胞(WBC)和铟-111标记的人非特异性免疫球蛋白G(IgG)进行闪烁扫描的结果。临床、放射学和微生物学检查结果被视为存在感染或炎症的证据。在这组主要为亚急性感染的患者中,铟-111标记的IgG闪烁扫描的表现明显优于铟-111标记的WBC闪烁扫描,尤其是在运动系统感染以及各种软组织感染中。两种技术在播散性耶尔森菌感染患者和一些结核病患者中均显示出令人失望的结果。铟-111标记的IgG闪烁扫描的总体敏感性和特异性分别为74%和100%,铟-111标记的WBC闪烁扫描的总体敏感性和特异性分别为52%和78%。