Dakin Emily, Pearlmutter Sue
College of Applied Human Sciences, School of Social Work, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523-1586, USA.
J Elder Abuse Negl. 2009 Jan-Mar;21(1):15-57. doi: 10.1080/08946560802571896.
In this study, older African American, Latina, and Caucasian women from varying socioeconomic backgrounds participated in eight focus groups that examined their perceptions of elder maltreatment and three ethical dilemmas within adult protective service work: mandatory reporting, involuntary protective services, and criminalization of elder maltreatment. Participants espoused a broad and inclusive view of elder maltreatment. In responding to illustrative case scenarios, participants strongly favored protection over freedom by supporting mandatory reporting and involuntary protective services. Criminalization of elder maltreatment also was supported. This article presents results of each scenario and broad themes across the study, with attention paid to areas of consistency and difference across ethnicity and socioeconomic categories.
在本研究中,来自不同社会经济背景的非裔美国老年女性、拉丁裔老年女性和白人老年女性参与了八个焦点小组,这些小组探讨了她们对老年人虐待的看法以及成人保护服务工作中的三个伦理困境:强制报告、非自愿保护服务以及将老年人虐待定为犯罪。参与者对老年人虐待持广泛且包容的观点。在回应说明性案例时,参与者通过支持强制报告和非自愿保护服务,强烈倾向于保护而非自由。将老年人虐待定为犯罪也得到了支持。本文呈现了每个案例的结果以及整个研究中的广泛主题,并关注了不同种族和社会经济类别的一致性和差异领域。