Kramer R L
J Pers Assess. 1991 Aug;57(1):30-6. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa5701_4.
The Exner (1986) system of scoring of the Rorschach results in a human movement response (M), which is far afield from Rorschach's original intent. This divergence can easily lead to faulty interpretations of a record as there is no need for kinesthetic reactions on behalf of the subject in Exner's system. The need to return to a traditional view of the M is demonstrated through a focus on theory and the literature that illustrates Rorschach's intent. The alteration of the M results in a scoring system which, due to its differences, must come up with a separate interpretative system and not consider itself part of the Rorschach system that Rorschach envisioned.
埃克斯纳（1986）对罗夏测验结果的评分系统得出一种人类动作反应（M），这与罗夏的初衷相去甚远。这种差异很容易导致对记录的错误解读，因为在埃克斯纳的系统中，受试者无需有动觉反应。通过关注阐释罗夏意图的理论和文献，证明了回归对动作反应的传统观点的必要性。动作反应的改变产生了一个评分系统，由于其差异，该系统必须提出一个单独的解释系统，而不能将自身视为罗夏所设想的罗夏测验系统的一部分。
