Frank G
Psychol Rep. 1994 Aug;75(1 Pt 1):315-20.
Research has established the clinical value of form level assessment. An issue remaining to be addressed involves the scoring of form level. Currently, several systems of scoring form level are in use, e.g., Rorschach's (and, hence, Beck's, Hertz's, and Piotrowski's) 2-category scale (F+, F-), Klopfer's 3-category scale (F+, F, F-), Exner's 4-category scale (F+, Fo, Fu, F-), and Rapaport's 7-category scale (F++, F+, Fo, F +/-, F -/+, Fv, F-). Further, Rorschach scored form level only for responses scored: F; Klopfer, on the other hand, scored form level for any response on which form was dominant, e.g., M+, FC+, F shading +). The question can be raised as to how refined a scaling of form level is needed to yield the most useful information and whether deriving a percentage form level for each determinant yields any more information than an assessment based only on responses scored F or an over-all R + %. The question was raised whether assessing the quality of organizational activity and detailing might contribute more information about personality than the current system of scoring form level in terms of goodness of fit between percept and blot. These questions need to be answered by research.
研究已经确立了形式水平评估的临床价值。一个有待解决的问题涉及形式水平的评分。目前，有几种形式水平评分系统正在使用，例如，罗夏（以及由此而来的贝克、赫兹和皮奥特罗夫斯基）的二分类量表（F+，F-），克洛普弗的三分类量表（F+，F，F-），埃克斯纳的四分类量表（F+，Fo，Fu，F-），以及拉帕波特的七分类量表（F++，F+，Fo，F +/ -，F -/+，Fv，F-）。此外，罗夏仅对评为F的反应进行形式水平评分；另一方面，克洛普弗对任何形式占主导的反应进行形式水平评分，例如M+、FC+、F 阴影 +）。可以提出这样的问题：需要多精细的形式水平量表才能产生最有用的信息，以及为每个决定因素得出形式水平百分比是否比仅基于评为F的反应或总体R + %的评估能提供更多信息。有人提出，就感知与墨迹之间的契合度而言，评估组织活动和细节的质量是否比当前的形式水平评分系统能提供更多关于人格的信息。这些问题需要通过研究来回答。
