Significance and reliability of the House-Brackmann grading system for regional facial nerve function.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the reliability of the House-Brackmann facial nerve grading scale in the setting of differential function across its branches.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Eleven physicians with different levels of clinical experience and three upper-level medical students were provided with digital video clips of 11 patients with differential facial nerve functioning, and asked to report facial nerve function as a traditional global score and as a regional score on the basis of the House-Brackmann scale for the forehead, eye, nose, and mouth. Agreements between the traditional global score and the regional scores, as well as inter-rater agreement, were analyzed.

RESULTS

In patients with variable facial weakness, a single House-Brackmann score did not fully communicate facial function. The single House-Brackmann score most strongly correlated with the regional scoring of the nose/midface (59%), followed by the mouth (51%), eye (48%), and forehead (35%). Overall inter-reader reliability was relatively strong for the midface (kappa = 0.503) and global scores (kappa = 0.541), followed by the mouth (k = 0.419), the forehead (k = 0.330), and the eye (k = 0.302). There was a marked tendency for reader agreement to increase among those with more clinical experience.

CONCLUSION

Regional assessment using the House-Brackmann grading scale more fully communicates facial function and increases in reliability with experience.