Monforte Víctor, Ussetti Piedad, López Rosa, Gavaldà Joan, Bravo Carles, de Pablo Alicia, Pou Leonor, Pahissa Albert, Morell Ferran, Román Antonio
Department of Pulmonology, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2009 Feb;28(2):170-5. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2008.11.004.
The main problem with using nebulized liposomal amphotericin (n-LAB) as prophylaxis for Aspergillus infection after lung transplantation is the lack of knowledge of its pharmacokinetics and its possible adverse effects. The aim of this study was to measure post-inhalation amphotericin B concentration in the respiratory tract and serum of lung transplant patients and assess the effects of n-LAB on respiratory function.
Thirty-two consecutive bronchoscopies were performed on 27 lung transplant patients at two hospitals. Amphotericin B concentration in the first and third aliquot of bronchoalveolar lavage material was measured in steady state. The first aliquot approximates most closely the true amphotericin B concentrations in the proximal airway, whereas the third aliquot provides an optimum sample from the distal airway.
At 2 days, mean amphotericin B concentrations were 11.1 microg/ml (95% confidence interval [CI]: 16.5 to 5.7 microg/ml) and 9.0 microg/ml (95% CI: 14.3 to 3.8 microg/ml) in the first and third aliquot, respectively. Thereafter, concentrations declined progressively. At 14 days, concentrations were 3.0 microg/ml (95% CI: 4.4 to 1.5 microg/ml) in the first aliquot and 4.1 microg/ml (95% CI: 6.1 to 2.1 microg/ml) in the third aliquot (p = not statistically significant). Traces of amphotericin B (0.1 microg/ml) were found in serum samples from only 1 of 27 patients. Mean value of forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV(1)) was similar before and after n-LAB.
Amphotericin B concentrations after n-LAB remained high for 14 days, at adequate concentrations for prophylaxis of Aspergillus infection. No significant systemic absorption of amphotericin B was detected and no effect was observed on respiratory function. This promising prophylactic regimen warrants assessment in future clinical studies.
雾化脂质体两性霉素(n-LAB)用于肺移植后曲霉感染预防的主要问题在于对其药代动力学及可能的不良反应缺乏了解。本研究旨在测定肺移植患者呼吸道和血清中吸入两性霉素B后的浓度,并评估n-LAB对呼吸功能的影响。
在两家医院对27例肺移植患者连续进行了32次支气管镜检查。在稳态下测定支气管肺泡灌洗材料第一份和第三份等分试样中的两性霉素B浓度。第一份等分试样最接近近端气道中真正的两性霉素B浓度,而第三份等分试样则提供了来自远端气道的最佳样本。
在第2天,第一份和第三份等分试样中两性霉素B的平均浓度分别为11.1微克/毫升(95%置信区间[CI]:16.5至5.7微克/毫升)和9.0微克/毫升(95%CI:14.3至3.8微克/毫升)。此后,浓度逐渐下降。在第14天,第一份等分试样中的浓度为3.0微克/毫升(95%CI:4.4至1.5微克/毫升),第三份等分试样中的浓度为4.1微克/毫升(95%CI:6.1至2.1微克/毫升)(p = 无统计学意义)。在27例患者中,仅1例患者的血清样本中发现痕量的两性霉素B(0.1微克/毫升)。n-LAB前后第一秒用力呼气量(FEV(1))的平均值相似。
n-LAB后两性霉素B浓度在14天内保持较高水平,达到预防曲霉感染的足够浓度。未检测到两性霉素B有明显的全身吸收,且未观察到对呼吸功能的影响。这种有前景的预防方案值得在未来的临床研究中进行评估。