Park Eun-Ah, Hong Sung Hwan, Kim Kwang Gi, Choi Ja-Young, Shin Chan Soo, Kang Heung Sik
Department of Radiology, Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, 110-744, Korea.
Acad Radiol. 2009 Mar;16(3):332-40. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2008.09.006.
The aim of this study was to investigate whether samples obtained using two kinds of small trephines, 2.4 and 1.8 mm in inner diameter, are sufficient for the quantitative evaluation of metabolic bone disease using micro-computed tomographic (CT) three-dimensional parameter data sets.
A total of 19 porcine lumbar vertebrae prior to biopsy and biopsy samples from the use of 2.4- and 1.8-mm trephines were examined using micro-CT imaging. For quantitative analysis, seven three-dimensional structural parameters, including trabecular bone volume, trabecular number, trabecular thickness, trabecular separation, the structure model index, the degree of anisotropy, and the trabecular bone pattern factor, were measured using CtAn software. The difference and agreement between the biopsy samples and the baseline vertebrae specimens before biopsy were assessed using paired t tests and Bland-Altman analysis, respectively.
There were no significant differences between the 2.4-mm samples and the baseline vertebrae specimens for trabecular bone volume, trabecular thickness, and trabecular number, with mean differences of -0.9%, 2.3%, and -3.1%, respectively; there was no significant difference between the 1.8-mm samples and the baseline vertebrae specimens only for trabecular thickness, with a mean difference of 1.9%.
Samples taken from the use of the 2.4-mm trephine were better for quantitative analysis than those from the use of the 1.8-mm trephine and were acceptable for the quantitative evaluation of trabecular bone volume, trabecular thickness, and trabecular number.
本研究旨在调查使用两种内径分别为2.4毫米和1.8毫米的小型环钻获取的样本,是否足以使用微型计算机断层扫描(CT)三维参数数据集对代谢性骨病进行定量评估。
对19个活检前的猪腰椎椎体以及使用2.4毫米和1.8毫米环钻获取的活检样本进行微型CT成像检查。为进行定量分析,使用CtAn软件测量了七个三维结构参数,包括骨小梁体积、骨小梁数量、骨小梁厚度、骨小梁间距、结构模型指数、各向异性程度和骨小梁骨模式因子。分别使用配对t检验和Bland-Altman分析评估活检样本与活检前基线椎体标本之间的差异和一致性。
对于骨小梁体积、骨小梁厚度和骨小梁数量,2.4毫米样本与基线椎体标本之间无显著差异,平均差异分别为-0.9%、2.3%和-3.1%;对于骨小梁厚度,1.8毫米样本与基线椎体标本之间仅存在1.9%的平均差异,无显著差异。
使用2.4毫米环钻获取的样本在定量分析方面优于使用1.8毫米环钻获取的样本,并且对于骨小梁体积、骨小梁厚度和骨小梁数量的定量评估是可接受的。