Melis Marcovalerio, McLoughlin James M, Dean E Michelle, Siegel Erin M, Weber Jill M, Shah Nilay, Kelley Scott T, Karl Richard C
Division of Gastrointestinal Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL 33612, USA.
J Surg Res. 2009 May 1;153(1):114-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2008.06.005. Epub 2008 Jul 31.
The influence of preoperative hemoglobin levels on outcomes of patients undergoing esophagectomy for cancer is not clearly defined. The goal of this article was to explore the association between combined modality therapy, preoperative anemia status, and perioperative blood transfusion and risk of postoperative complications among patients undergoing esophageal resection.
From a retrospective esophageal database, 413 patients were identified. Anemia was defined according to the World Health Organization classification of <13 g/dL or <12 g/dL for men or women, respectively. Statistical analysis was performed with analysis of variance, Pearson's chi(2), or Fisher exact test as appropriate. The independent association of anemia, blood transfusion, and combined modality treatment on risk of postoperative complications were examined using multiple logistic regression.
Information on combined modality treatment, preoperative hemoglobin levels, and blood transfusion was available for 413 patients, of whom 57% received combined modality treatment. Overall 197 (47.6%) patients were preoperatively found to be anemic, and those who had received combined modality treatment were more likely to be anemic (60.6% versus 30.7%, P < 0.001). Anemic patients required more blood transfusions than nonanemic patients (46.7% versus 29.6%, P < 0.001). Seventy-five percent of patients who required transfusion during the hospital stay had received combined modality treatment (P = 0.01). Combined modality treatment and anemia were not associated with increased risk of complications. Patients with any perioperative complication and surgical site infections were more likely to have received blood transfusion compared to patients without complications (OR = 1.73; 95% CI 1.04-2.87 and OR = 2.98; 95% CI 1.04-8.55; respectively).
Overall, we determined that administration of neoadjuvant treatment to esophageal cancer patients was not associated with an increased rate of perioperative complications. Preoperative anemia did not predict worsened short-term outcomes, but increased the chances of red blood cell transfusion, which were significantly associated with higher overall complications and increased risk of surgical site infections. These data confirm previous studies that allogenic red blood cell transfusions are independent risk factors for increased morbidity and mortality and should be minimized during surgery for esophageal cancer.
术前血红蛋白水平对接受食管癌切除术患者预后的影响尚不明确。本文的目的是探讨综合治疗、术前贫血状态、围手术期输血与食管切除术患者术后并发症风险之间的关联。
从一个回顾性食管数据库中识别出413例患者。贫血根据世界卫生组织的分类定义,男性<13 g/dL,女性<12 g/dL。根据情况采用方差分析、Pearson卡方检验或Fisher精确检验进行统计分析。使用多元逻辑回归分析贫血、输血和综合治疗与术后并发症风险的独立关联。
413例患者可获得综合治疗、术前血红蛋白水平和输血的信息,其中57%接受了综合治疗。总体而言,术前发现197例(47.6%)患者贫血,接受综合治疗的患者更易贫血(60.6%对30.7%,P<0.001)。贫血患者比非贫血患者需要更多输血(46.7%对29.6%,P<0.001)。住院期间需要输血的患者中有75%接受了综合治疗(P = 0.01)。综合治疗和贫血与并发症风险增加无关。与无并发症的患者相比,有任何围手术期并发症和手术部位感染的患者更可能接受了输血(比值比分别为1.73;95%置信区间1.04 - 2.87和2.98;95%置信区间1.04 - 8.55)。
总体而言,我们确定对食管癌患者进行新辅助治疗与围手术期并发症发生率增加无关。术前贫血并未预示短期预后恶化,但增加了红细胞输血的几率,这与更高的总体并发症和手术部位感染风险显著相关。这些数据证实了先前的研究,即异体红细胞输血是发病率和死亡率增加的独立危险因素,在食管癌手术期间应尽量减少。