Garrett Matthew C, Komotar Ricardo J, Starke Robert M, Merkow Maxwell B, Otten Marc L, Sciacca Robert R, Connolly E Sander
Department of Neurosurgery, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, United States.
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2009 May;111(4):319-26. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2008.12.012. Epub 2009 Feb 7.
The 1985 International Extracranial-Intracranial (EC-IC) Bypass Trial failed to show a benefit following surgery in patients with varying degrees of angiographic ICA stenosis. More recent studies using modern technology to identify appropriate candidates, however, have generated promising findings. As a result, controversy exists regarding the role of this technique in the treatment of symptomatic athero-occlusive disease. To this end, we performed a systematic review and quantitative analysis of the literature to determine if a subset of patients with symptomatic hemodynamic failure secondary to athero-occlusive disease may benefit from direct EC-IC bypass.
We performed a MEDLINE (1985-2007) database search using the following keywords, singly and in combination: EC-IC bypass, hemodynamic failure and misery perfusion. Additional studies were identified manually by scrutinizing references from identified manuscripts, major neurosurgical journals and texts, and personal files. Our literature search divided studies into three categories: natural history of patients with stage I hemodynamic failure (16 studies, 2320 patients), natural history of patients with stage II hemodynamic failure (3 studies 163 patients), and outcomes of patients with hemodynamic failure treated by EC-IC bypass (23 studies 506 patients).
Patients with severe stage I and stage II hemodynamic failure are at higher risk of cerebral infarction than those with mild disease (p=.014, OR 1.17-4.08 and p=0.10, OR 0.89-3.63, respectively). Additionally, patients with severe hemodynamic failure respond better to surgery than those with mild disease (p=0.03, OR 0.16-0.92).
Patients with severe hemodynamic failure secondary to athero-occlusive disease appear to benefit from direct EC-IC bypass surgery. As a result, the conclusions of the 1985 International EC-IC Bypass Trial may not be applicable to this subset of patients. A randomized clinical trial involving this patient population is warranted.
1985年国际颅外-颅内(EC-IC)旁路试验未能显示不同程度血管造影性颈内动脉(ICA)狭窄患者术后有获益。然而,近期采用现代技术识别合适候选者的研究产生了有前景的结果。因此,关于该技术在有症状动脉粥样硬化闭塞性疾病治疗中的作用存在争议。为此,我们对文献进行了系统回顾和定量分析,以确定继发于动脉粥样硬化闭塞性疾病的有症状血流动力学衰竭患者亚组是否可从直接EC-IC旁路手术中获益。
我们使用以下关键词单独及组合在MEDLINE(1985 - 2007年)数据库中进行检索:EC-IC旁路、血流动力学衰竭和灌注不良。通过仔细查阅已识别手稿、主要神经外科期刊和文献以及个人档案中的参考文献手动识别其他研究。我们的文献检索将研究分为三类:I期血流动力学衰竭患者的自然史(16项研究,2320例患者)、II期血流动力学衰竭患者的自然史(3项研究,163例患者)以及接受EC-IC旁路手术治疗的血流动力学衰竭患者的结局(23项研究,506例患者)。
重度I期和II期血流动力学衰竭患者比轻度疾病患者发生脑梗死的风险更高(分别为p = 0.014,OR 1.17 - 4.08和p = 0.10,OR 0.89 - 3.63)。此外,重度血流动力学衰竭患者对手术的反应比轻度疾病患者更好(p = 0.03,OR 0.16 - 0.92)。
继发于动脉粥样硬化闭塞性疾病的重度血流动力学衰竭患者似乎可从直接EC-IC旁路手术中获益。因此,1985年国际EC-IC旁路试验的结论可能不适用于这一患者亚组。有必要针对这一患者群体开展一项随机临床试验。