Suppr超能文献

一项关于合生元与益生菌或益生元治疗对改善溃疡性结肠炎患者生活质量疗效的随机对照试验。

A randomized controlled trial on the efficacy of synbiotic versus probiotic or prebiotic treatment to improve the quality of life in patients with ulcerative colitis.

作者信息

Fujimori Shunji, Gudis Katya, Mitsui Keigo, Seo Tsuguhiko, Yonezawa Masaoki, Tanaka Shu, Tatsuguchi Atsushi, Sakamoto Choitsu

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Nutrition. 2009 May;25(5):520-5. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2008.11.017. Epub 2009 Feb 8.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Studies suggest that synbiotic therapy could prove more effective in the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC) than therapies limited to probiotics or prebiotics. This study compared the effect of each of these therapies in the treatment of UC.

METHODS

One hundred twenty outpatients with UC were randomly sorted into three groups of 40 patients each for probiotic, prebiotic, or synbiotic therapy. The probiotic group ingested one daily capsule consisting of Bifidobacterium longum 2 x 10(9) colony-forming units and the prebiotic group ingested daily 8.0-g doses of psyllium. The synbiotic group underwent both treatments. All patients completed Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaires (IBDQs) at the onset of the trial, at the 2-wk midpoint, and at the 4-wk end of the trial. Blood variables were also evaluated in a subset of 32 patients randomly selected from all groups and values were compared with IBDQ scores.

RESULTS

Thirty-one patients in the probiotic group, 31 in the prebiotic group, and 32 in the synbiotic group qualified for analyses. The remaining 26 patients had incomplete questionnaires. Total IBDQ scores improved within groups by the end of the trial (probiotics 162 to 169, NS; prebiotics 174 to 182, NS; synbiotics 168 to 176, P = 0.03). Individual scores improved as follows: probiotics, emotional function (P = 0.03); prebiotics, bowel function (P = 0.04); and synbiotics, systemic and social functions (P = 0.008 and P = 0.02). C-reactive protein decreased significantly only with synbiotic therapy (from 0.59 to 0.14 mg/dL, P = 0.04). There were no adverse events.

CONCLUSION

Patients with UC on synbiotic therapy experienced greater quality-of-life changes than patients on probiotic or prebiotic treatment. These data suggest that synbiotic therapy may have a synergistic effect in the treatment of UC.

摘要

目的

研究表明,合生元疗法在治疗溃疡性结肠炎(UC)方面可能比仅限于益生菌或益生元的疗法更有效。本研究比较了这些疗法各自在治疗UC中的效果。

方法

120例UC门诊患者被随机分为三组,每组40例,分别接受益生菌、益生元或合生元治疗。益生菌组每天服用一粒胶囊,其中含有2×10⁹菌落形成单位的长双歧杆菌,益生元组每天服用8.0克的车前子壳。合生元组同时接受这两种治疗。所有患者在试验开始时、试验2周中点和试验4周结束时均完成炎症性肠病问卷(IBDQ)。还对从所有组中随机选取的32例患者的子集进行了血液变量评估,并将结果与IBDQ评分进行比较。

结果

益生菌组31例、益生元组31例和合生元组32例符合分析条件。其余26例患者的问卷不完整。试验结束时,各组的IBDQ总分均有所改善(益生菌组从162分提高到169分,无统计学意义;益生元组从174分提高到182分,无统计学意义;合生元组从168分提高到176分,P = 0.03)。各项得分改善情况如下:益生菌组,情绪功能(P = 0.03);益生元组,肠道功能(P = 0.04);合生元组,全身和社会功能(P = 0.008和P = 0.02)。仅合生元疗法使C反应蛋白显著降低(从0.59毫克/分升降至0.14毫克/分升,P = 0.04)。未发生不良事件。

结论

接受合生元治疗的UC患者比接受益生菌或益生元治疗的患者生活质量变化更大。这些数据表明,合生元疗法在治疗UC中可能具有协同作用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验