Daniel Elkan E, Masilamani Rekha, Rahman Mizanur
Pathfinder International/India, New Delhi, India.
Int Fam Plan Perspect. 2008 Dec;34(4):189-97. doi: 10.1363/ifpp.34.189.08.
Contraceptive use among young couples in India is low, and early childbearing and short birth intervals are common. The PRACHAR Project, an ongoing intervention in Bihar, seeks to increase contraceptive use for delaying and spacing births through communication interventions.
Random samples of married women younger than 25 with no more than one child were surveyed in 2002-2003, before PRACHAR was implemented (N=1,995), and in 2004, 21-27 months after implementation (N=2,080). Contraceptive demand and use, and related attitudes and knowledge, were assessed in the two surveys in both intervention areas and comparison areas. Logistic regression was used to assess the effect of the interventions on these indicators.
Contraceptive use was very low (2-6%) at baseline in both comparison and intervention areas. Demand for contraception increased from 25% at baseline to 40% at follow-up in intervention areas, but remained virtually unchanged in comparison areas. At follow-up, contraceptive use had risen in both areas, but the adjusted odds of use in intervention areas were 3.8 times those in comparison areas. Women in intervention areas had elevated odds of knowing that fertility varies during the menstrual cycle, and of agreeing that early childbirth can be harmful and that contraceptive use is necessary and safe for delaying first births (odds ratios, 1.6-3.0).
Culturally appropriate, community-based communication programs that target youth and those who influence their decisions can create demand for contraception among young couples and lead to increased contraceptive use.
印度年轻夫妇的避孕措施使用率较低,早育和生育间隔短的情况很常见。正在比哈尔邦进行的PRACHAR项目旨在通过沟通干预措施来提高避孕措施的使用率,以推迟生育并拉开生育间隔。
在2002 - 2003年(PRACHAR项目实施前,N = 1995)以及2004年(实施后21 - 27个月,N = 2080),对年龄小于25岁且子女不超过一个的已婚妇女进行随机抽样调查。在干预地区和对照地区的两次调查中,评估了避孕需求与使用情况以及相关态度和知识。采用逻辑回归分析来评估干预措施对这些指标的影响。
在基线时,对照地区和干预地区的避孕措施使用率都非常低(2 - 6%)。干预地区对避孕措施的需求从基线时的25%增加到随访时的40%,而对照地区几乎没有变化。在随访时,两个地区的避孕措施使用率都有所上升,但干预地区使用避孕措施的调整后优势比是对照地区的3.8倍。干预地区的妇女更有可能知道月经周期中生育能力会发生变化,也更有可能认同早育有害,以及使用避孕措施对推迟首次生育是必要且安全的(优势比为1.6 - 3.0)。
针对年轻人以及那些影响他们决策的人群开展的、符合文化背景的社区沟通项目,能够在年轻夫妇中创造对避孕措施的需求,并导致避孕措施使用率的提高。